clumsygirl Posted May 15, 2011 Share Posted May 15, 2011 love is love, sex is sex. why can't women separate love and sex? There is only one reason that women can't get orgasm whenever they want by their sex nature. In my eyes, I think love is love, sex is sex. There is no necessary relationship between the two. Sex is like eating, drinking or shitting. You should do it every day when you need, but you never fall in love with food, water or toilet. Do you understand? I don't know why it is so easy for me, but it is so hard for other women. When I fall in love with somebody, I want to be with him all time, and I care about everything about him. I would like to share every minute with him. When we kiss, I can be sexual arousal in one second. I feel my whole bones are crisp, and my private parts are numb, I can't move anyway. Until that feeling gone, I can move. But sex is never that way. First I want to ejaculate, then I see a porn, In the whole process, I don't need to be moved. I just need my some my organ aroused enough. I think one day all women are not going to be cheated by so-called fake female orgasm and can ejaculate like me, you will know what I am talking about nowadays. i am keeping to reveal the truth of female orgasm. if you have interest in female orgasm, contact me. i am sure we can work something out together. i want to find an international cooperation, because i am lack of some useful equipments like PET or MRI. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cap'n Refsmmat Posted May 15, 2011 Share Posted May 15, 2011 clumsygirl: Please see SFN rule 8. You're just posting stuff copied from your blog, and you don't seem interested in sticking around to discuss it here. We'd rather you stick around and respond to comments. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lemur Posted May 15, 2011 Share Posted May 15, 2011 This thread seems to be geared toward discussing differentiations between feelings of love-interactions and pornographic arousal/ejaculation/orgasm. The OP seems to be trying to make some point about women emphasizing love-feelings over arousal-driven sexuality, but it's not clear exactly what or why. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cap'n Refsmmat Posted May 15, 2011 Share Posted May 15, 2011 Judging by this part: I think one day all women are not going to be cheated by so-called fake female orgasm and can ejaculate like me, you will know what I am talking about nowadays. The OP believes that female ejaculation is the One True Orgasm, and any orgasm that doesn't involve it is fake. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lemur Posted May 15, 2011 Share Posted May 15, 2011 (edited) The OP believes that female ejaculation is the One True Orgasm, and any orgasm that doesn't involve it is fake. Is it appropriate to discuss what is meant by different types of orgasms in this thread or should another be started? I think "fake orgasm" should be limited to describing dramatic behavior with the intent of simulating orgasm to partners and/or observers (and maybe even oneself) purely for purposes of erotic stimulation or signification of satisfaction. In other words, "fake orgasm" should only refer to an intentionally acted-out behavior and not to an experiential response to stimulus. If the OP wants to claim that certain experiences can be mistaken to be orgasms but are not really true orgasms, that should be termed something else, though I can't figure out a succinct term that could describe such a thing. . . maybe "alter-orgasm?" Edited May 15, 2011 by lemur Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cap'n Refsmmat Posted May 15, 2011 Share Posted May 15, 2011 Pseudorgasms? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lemur Posted May 16, 2011 Share Posted May 16, 2011 Pseudorgasms? Does English have a limit to the number of diphthongs allowed per word? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
imatfaal Posted May 16, 2011 Share Posted May 16, 2011 (edited) How are you pronouncing it to get multiple (any) diphthongs? /sud.ɔː.ɡæz.əm/ - and if you mean digraphs then diphthongs has just as many in fewer letters Edited May 16, 2011 by imatfaal Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lemur Posted May 16, 2011 Share Posted May 16, 2011 How are you pronouncing it to get multiple (any) diphthongs? /sud.ɔː.ɡæz.əm/ - and if you mean digraphs then diphthongs has just as many in fewer letters You're right. I guess it was a pseudodiphthong. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
imatfaal Posted May 16, 2011 Share Posted May 16, 2011 I now think that was one big set up and that I was the unwitting straight-guy. nice one Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now