Vak Posted November 7, 2010 Share Posted November 7, 2010 Elementary particle — autosoliton or the connected groups of autosolitons among fudls. They self-arise from vacuum — disorder area of the Lattice — owing to fluctuations of oscillatory and transfer activity of fudls. So, self-arisen photons represent not that other as "relic" radiation. Full text: http://vak.jino.ru/particles.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
swansont Posted November 7, 2010 Share Posted November 7, 2010 ! Moderator Note Vak, this is a site that exists for discussion, not to drive traffic to your site. How would one go about testing your model? How is it falsifiable? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vak Posted November 7, 2010 Author Share Posted November 7, 2010 Swansont, delete your literary trash, and move my topic back! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ajb Posted November 7, 2010 Share Posted November 7, 2010 How would one go about testing your model? How is it falsifiable? I cannot see a model presented on the website. To Vak: A couple to simple questions What is an autosoliton? Assuming it is a kind of solition, what models have these excitations? How does your idea relate to sigma models and the works of Skyrme? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ydoaPs Posted November 7, 2010 Share Posted November 7, 2010 Swansont, delete your literary trash, and move my topic back! Demanding things from the staff doesn't usually work well. You might want to be nicer and you might also want to follow our rules and etiquette guidelines. If you feel that swansont has treated you unfairly, you can contact a different staff member via Private Message so that they may analyze the situation and take any necessary action. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
swansont Posted November 7, 2010 Share Posted November 7, 2010 1. Literary trash? 2. No. Feel free to contact another moderator, and try and convince them that your material isn't speculative. Good luck with that. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mississippichem Posted November 7, 2010 Share Posted November 7, 2010 Swansont, delete your literary trash, and move my topic back! That's not literary trash. Harry Potter is literary trash! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now