Jump to content

How thick is printer paper?


dstebbins

Recommended Posts

Standard printer paper is approximately .1mm thick. For paper with a basis weight of 20 lbs, which is what I use in my printer, has a thickness of .097 mm. So you are right the Cha Cha answer does appear to be way off the mark.

 

For fun, I did a quick check. I measured a ream of unopened paper to have a height of about 4.6 cm. The ream contains 500 sheets of paper with a paper wrapping on the top and the bottom. Lets assume the paper wrapping in the same thickness as the actual printer paper. This would mean the ream has 502 sheets of paper in it. At a height of 4.6 cm or 46 mm, this would mean each piece of paper has a height of .0916 mm. Which for seems close enough to the wikipedia value for me to accept them both.

Edited by DJBruce
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 7 months later...
  • 1 month later...
  • 5 years later...

A mil is not short for millimeter. A mil is one thousand of an inch or 0.001"

Love it SLIDER7W. Its been over 44 years since I studied any physics or math and I had forgotten that 1 mil is not 1 mm. Thanks for that wonderful reminder. It is quite helpful when dealing on-line where most folks use the terms interchangeably. But then a lot of those folks do not know the difference between to and too or then and than and gobs of other stuff, let alone math or physics things.

As you said 1 mil is 0.001" while 1 mm is 0.039370" or almost 40 times greater (thicker, in this case). Best regards, Murf (age 78)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This does not help any more than the above post, just general interest. You could also start from basic principles and work out the dimensions: a sheet of area 1 square metre is A0, half that is A1, half again is A2 and so on. The ratio of sides is such that the shape does not change when cutting in half to get 2x A1 from an A0. You could then work out the dimensions of an A4 piece of paper (involving the fourth root of 2) hence the thickness at 80 g/m2. All this is extremely useful if ever you need an extremely small but accurate weight. This has absolutely nothing to do with a small pair of scales and cannabis.

 

Edit: I've just noticed the thread necromancy

Edited by DrKrettin
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This does not help any more than the above post, just general interest. You could also start from basic principles and work out the dimensions: a sheet of area 1 square metre is A0, half that is A1, half again is A2 and so on. The ratio of sides is such that the shape does not change when cutting in half to get 2x A1 from an A0. You could then work out the dimensions of an A4 piece of paper (involving the fourth root of 2) hence the thickness at 80 g/m2. All this is extremely useful if ever you need an extremely small but accurate weight. This has absolutely nothing to do with a small pair of scales and cannabis.

 

Edit: I've just noticed the thread necromancy

Even so, a forum like this is a source of knowledge and whether the conversation is current doesn't really matter. Any addition of information, like you've just done, will be useful for someone looking into the subject. I'm sure you have knowingly read long-finished conversations trying to find information.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This does not help any more than the above post, just general interest. You could also start from basic principles and work out the dimensions: a sheet of area 1 square metre is A0, half that is A1, half again is A2 and so on. The ratio of sides is such that the shape does not change when cutting in half to get 2x A1 from an A0. You could then work out the dimensions of an A4 piece of paper (involving the fourth root of 2) hence the thickness at 80 g/m2. All this is extremely useful if ever you need an extremely small but accurate weight. This has absolutely nothing to do with a small pair of scales and cannabis.

 

Edit: I've just noticed the thread necromancy

Interesting idea.

 

For the record: this is absolute accuracy. The relative accuracy won't be that great.

Edited by Bender
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 years later...
On 3/25/2011 at 6:18 PM, Slider7w said:

A mil is not short for millimeter. A mil is one thousand of an inch or 0.001"

After having worked in the auto repair industry since 1975, I have never heard a "thou" called a "mil".  Common engine components like spark plug gaps back in 1975 were spoken as 35 thou, 60 thou, but written as 0.035 or 0.060.   I have been lucky and managed to live in Canada and have avoided the metric system like the plague.  BTW, to be on topic, why not just use Vernier caliper.  Mine says 3 thou or 0.08 mm for a single sheet of 20lb bond, that has been in an air conditioned environment almost its whole life.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.