Jump to content

Circle.


ydoaPs

Is a circle spinning near c still a circle?  

1 member has voted

  1. 1. Is a circle spinning near c still a circle?



Recommended Posts

  • Replies 169
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

why would it shrink?????????? if the radius shrank, wouldn't there be no circle if it got close enough to c?

Only in the same way that there would be no circle due to the circumference shrinking, one would assume.

 

If the circumference shrinks, the radius shrinks "automatically". Of course that assumes Euclidean geometry, which after a mammoth ammount of tooth-pulling we learn is left behind in this example.

 

Considering you set this thread up to explain the phenomenon I don't see why it should be so difficult for us to extract explanations for it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

why would it shrink?????????? if the radius shrank, wouldn't there be no circle if it got close enough to c?
Can't you just give it up? You're not really contradicting us, just continually stating a new reason that you are right.

Plus you're giving yourself a bad reputation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

the radius only has one dimension and it doesn't shrink due to motion. the cercumference has nothing to do with if an object is a circle; it is just the length of the distance from one point in the set to itself.

 

 

edit: it still has the same equation' date=' it is still a circle.[/quote']

First, doesn't the radius have two dimensions. And second, wouldn't it experience the exact same relativistic effects as the circumfrence because it's basicly just an extension of the circumfrence. It would spin in the same direction and at the same velocity.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Do you know of any representations of that geometry I can take a look at?

 

If you have a globe in your home that is problem one of the best ways to look at it, because it has the great circles marked in it (the equator and the lines of longitude or 'meridians'). You should see that any circle drawn om the globe has a radius larger than a Eucldean circle's radius of the same circumfenrce (though the ratio tends to pi as r tends to zero) simalirly you can see that the angles of triangles always add up to more than 180 degrees (again though the sum tends to 180 as the area of the triangle temds to zero).

http://mathworld.wolfram.com/SphericalGeometry.html

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you have a globe in your home that is problem one of the best ways to look at it' date=' because it has the great circles marked in it (the equator and the lines of longitude or 'meridians'). You should see that any circle drawn om the globe has a radius larger than a Eucldean circle's radius of the same circumfenrce (though the ratio tends to pi as r tends to zero) simalirly you can see that the angles of triangles always add up to more than 180 degrees (again though the sum tends to 180 as the area of the triangle temds to zero).

http://mathworld.wolfram.com/SphericalGeometry.html[/quote']

A much better explanation.

 

My question now is: can we consider a circle to be equal to a great circle?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm guessing that taking the shortest radius of the circle described by the circumference of the great circle is cheating?

 

Well on sphere of radius R (though rember that R can just be parameter describing the geomery it needn't be the radius of any actual sphere) the circumeference of the great cricle is:

 

2pi*R, but the radius is pi*R/2

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i don't know the "answer." it went from being a flat circle to being on a globe. how did that happen?

 

If your talking about the relativstic disc, I posted a link a few pages back which explains the scenatio in detail.

 

I'm just using spherical geometry as an example of non-Eucldean geometry.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The radius isn't an object affected by relativity.

The radius is a line only in your imagination.

The circle however is an object affected by relativity and will shrink when it's rotating (around a line perpendicular to the circle plane).

When circumference is shrinking the radius will too...

 

Which means it's still a circle, just a bit smaller.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.