Jump to content

Is this correct?


Gareth56

Recommended Posts

The equations in the original post are obviously incorrect from a dimensional analysis perspective. The left-hand side of (mg-ma)/g=1-a/g has units of mass while the right hand side is unitless.

 

Are you sure the text doesn't have (mg-ma)/g = m(1-a/g), which is trivially correct?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The question is asking for a ratio of force to a persons weight.

 

The solution in the book states the following:-

 

F(rope) = mg - ma and the weight of person = mg

 

therefore the ratio of F(rope) to their weight = (mg - ma)/g = 1.0 - a/g

 

So my question was how do you get from (mg - ma)/g to 1.0 - a/g

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The question is asking for a ratio of force to a persons weight.

 

The solution in the book states the following:-

 

F(rope) = mg - ma and the weight of person = mg

 

therefore the ratio of F(rope) to their weight = (mg - ma)/g = 1.0 - a/g

 

So my question was how do you get from (mg - ma)/g to 1.0 - a/g

 

The ratio of F(force) to their weight is :

 

(mg-ma)/mg = 1-a/g

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes it is but in the book the 'm' is missing from the denominator so I am assuming that there is a typo in the book as without the 'm' being in the denominator the answer cannot be 1 - a/g.

 

If there was a mechanism to display an image of the page from the book then I think it would be easier to show what the problem is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes it is but in the book the 'm' is missing from the denominator so I am assuming that there is a typo in the book as without the 'm' being in the denominator the answer cannot be 1 - a/g.

 

If there was a mechanism to display an image of the page from the book then I think it would be easier to show what the problem is.

 

 

Yes there is a typo in the book. No doubt about it

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...
  • 4 months later...

but, considering that it is a physics equation, the terms have units.

 

0 kg does not equal 0 with no units.

 

Its conditionally correct.

 

if mg-ma = g-a , m should be 1, 0

 

if m=1

(mg-ma)/g =(g-a)/g

=1 -a/g

 

if m=0

g-a =0

(mg-ma)g= 0/g

= g-a/g

= 1- a/g

 

a = g, not 0

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

I think (based on your initial post),

 

equation: (mg - ma)/g = m(g/g) - m(a/g) = m - m(a/g)

 

given: mg-ma = g-a, m = 1 OR 0

 

for m=0: m - m(a/g) = 0

 

for m=1: m - m(a/g) = 1 - (a/g)

Edited by khaled
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.