aman Posted February 14, 2003 Author Share Posted February 14, 2003 Positrons and Anti-protons seem to indicate behaving the same as our matter so far in these tests by CERN Here They are anxious to test anti-hydrogen. The program is called ATRAP. Their figures of certainty can still be improved upon. Just aman Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NSX Posted February 14, 2003 Share Posted February 14, 2003 Originally posted by MrL_JaKiri ps. Look at the post to which I was replying, I think a simple answer suffices. :toilet: That's encouraging.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
baigligan Posted February 28, 2003 Share Posted February 28, 2003 Originally posted by aman Are there any working theories for anti-matter containment in a matter enviroment? I can't imagine containing a gas or liquid but maybe if we have a metal anti-element it can be magnetically suspended in a vacuum. I read the problem with making anti-hydrogen last for any period of time is its neutral charge as an atom, so it loses magnetic containment and reacts with the walls of the chamber. It seems we can make plenty but we can't seem to keep it around. Just aman to keep it in magnetic bottle is little problem.the bigger is that anti-matter live no longer than 1/1000,000,000 of second.what can we do for such short time.if we can make stability better we will enjoy the endless source of energy because when we join together 1 gramm of matter and 1 gramm of anti-matter they will anihilate and energy that they will make will be enough for 1000 watt torsh to work 2860 years(thats right 2860).thats calculated by scientists,its not my imagination. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fafalone Posted February 28, 2003 Share Posted February 28, 2003 We can keep antimatter much longer. In fact, experiments are under way with the 50,000 atoms of anti-hydrogen CERN produces each year. It seems like bulgaria is about 10 years behind current research Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
baigligan Posted March 2, 2003 Share Posted March 2, 2003 Originally posted by fafalone We can keep antimatter much longer. In fact, experiments are under way with the 50,000 atoms of anti-hydrogen CERN produces each year. It seems like bulgaria is about 10 years behind current research I am too bissy so may be i missed some news about anti-mater,but thats not reason to insult my country.i left other forum just by the same reason-there was a couple of philosophising guys who just didnt accept opinion different than theyr own.so dont comment my english please- i still learn it.if u want i can tell u what inventions are made by bulgarian scientists but u will blame me in lie because theyr number is pretty big.i will never use translating programs(this way i will never improve my english)so like old philosoph said-SIMPLE MINDS DISSCUS PERSONS,THE CLEVER ONES DISSCUS IDEAS. so ur next post will show me to wich group belong ur self.at least here we can share ideas not only what is written in the books. STAY HEALTY AND HAPPY Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fafalone Posted March 2, 2003 Share Posted March 2, 2003 Ok see i'm not a philosopher expressing different opinions, i am a scientist stating a fact. it is a FACT that we have anti-matter storage, it is a FACT that we can detect neutrinos. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Radical Edward Posted March 2, 2003 Share Posted March 2, 2003 antimatter is very stable, provided you don't run it into anything. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Firedragon52 Posted September 3, 2004 Share Posted September 3, 2004 antimatter is very stable, provided you don't run it into anything.How do we know this? Is this just theorized? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[Tycho?] Posted September 3, 2004 Share Posted September 3, 2004 How do we know this? Is this just theorized? No, we have produces plenty of positrons and anti-protons, even combining them to form anit-hydrogen. A positron for example is just as stable as an electron as far as I know, I was under the impression that mass and such properties were identical. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Severian Posted September 3, 2004 Share Posted September 3, 2004 Not quite identical - the electroweak force violates CP, meaning that it behaves (slightly) differently for matter and antimatter. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flak Posted September 3, 2004 Share Posted September 3, 2004 Anti-matter can be of great use for propulsion devices to reach high speeds, however is unsure if they can be aislated on big quantities somewhere, neither talk about "secure" manipulation. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Firedragon52 Posted September 8, 2004 Share Posted September 8, 2004 Not quite identical - the electroweak force violates CP, meaning that it behaves (slightly) differently for matter and antimatter.Is it known what this slight difference is? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thales Posted September 9, 2004 Share Posted September 9, 2004 Yes. Its has to do with the differeing decay rates of anit-B-Mesons as confirmed recently by the team working on the BaBar experiment at SLAC. Here's a link; http://www.slac.stanford.edu/slac/media-info/20010726/pr072601.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ydoaPs Posted September 9, 2004 Share Posted September 9, 2004 why not just have positrons or antiprotons in a magnetic bottle? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now