Jump to content

Schrödinger's cat question


Fozzie

Recommended Posts

I have only recently become familiar with this concept, so please forgive me if my question seems daft. Schrödinger wrote "Until the box is opened at the end of the hour, we will not know what has happened. According to quantum law then, the cat is both dead and alive, in a superposition of states. It is only when we break open the box and learn the condition of that cat that the superposition is lost, and the cat becomes either dead or alive.

 

It's the "both dead AND alive" bit that I cannot grasp. Why not "dead OR alive" because at that stage, we still don't know, so the answer has to be OR, as there are two possibilities.

 

To take another example, before a tin of beans it opened, it will either contain beans, OR it won't. It can't be full and empty at the same time. So why is it necessary to use this play on words? :confused:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Because that's the way it is in quantum mechanics. When a system is in a superposition of states, it behaves like it is in both states at once. It isn't in just one state until you actually measure it to be in that state.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So I presume a superposition of states must be purely theoretical, because once you take a measurement, as you say, it isn't in just one state until you actually measure it to be in that state.

 

So was this superposition theory derived mathematically?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So I presume a superposition of states must be purely theoretical, because once you take a measurement, as you say, it isn't in just one state until you actually measure it to be in that state.

 

It is all theoretical in the sense that we have a mathematical description. The only real things are what can be measured.

 

Anyway, It seems that the idea of superposition of states is unavoidable in quantum mechanics. Quantum mechanics has passed all experimental tests asked of it. There is plenty of experimental work evolving superposition of states and entangled states.

 

So was this superposition theory derived mathematically?

 

If a system has, lets say two states which we will call [math]|alive\rangle[/math] and [math]|dead\rangle[/math], then a general state is

 

[math]|general \rangle = |alive\rangle + |dead \rangle[/math],

 

(up to some linear coefficents).

 

The point is that when a measurement is made one of the alive and dead states is "selected" and that is what you see.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If a system has, lets say two states which we will call [math]|alive\rangle[/math] and [math]|dead\rangle[/math], then a general state is

 

[math]|general \rangle = |alive\rangle + |dead \rangle[/math],

 

(up to some linear coefficents).

 

The point is that when a measurement is made one of the alive and dead states is "selected" and that is what you see.

 

The "linear coefficients" including a possible - sign, which has certain ramifications. But probably beyond the scope of discussion here.


Merged post follows:

Consecutive posts merged
So I presume a superposition of states must be purely theoretical, because once you take a measurement, as you say, it isn't in just one state until you actually measure it to be in that state.

 

No, the superposition has actual consequences — the states can interfere. An ensemble in a linear superposition of states is not simply a mixture of particles with half in one state and half in another.

 

http://electron6.phys.utk.edu/QM1/modules/m5/interference.htm

 

This has implications on what results one can see, and these can be (and have been) measured.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

ok if the cat is both alive and dead y cant we see it that way? y do we only measure after opening the box that its dead or alive? i asked something like this regarding photons where Mr swanshot said that this is how there trajectory is defined. but my question is if something can simultaneously be in two states or places how can we say it's the same thing which is present? whenever there is a difference in position at the same time how can we ever consider the things same? please reply.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I suppose you could come up with an experiment where the alive/dead superposition could interfere and have some result that could be measured, but I can't think of one right now. We can only measure alive or dead because those are the eigenstates of the system; once we open the box, we collapse the wave function. But until we've done that, or there has been some other interaction that does it, we have a superposition of states.

 

The purpose behind this thought experiment is to illustrate the weirdness of quantum mechanics.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

OK Here is my question.

 

What does it mean? Why would you need to answer this question? Now from my understanding this is in some sort of relation to superstring theory. Bear with me, I admit I'm not sure. It has always been my thought the point of this was for our living determination.

 

I mean that I see a guy a bus alive. The girl next to me sees me. Kids at a playground see the bus go by the school. A person in a business office looks down at the kids. A passenger on a plan is looking at the buildings. Then from the space some astronauts looks down at the small plans traveling about. This goes on and on until at some point who look at all of us to know we are actually alive.

 

Again.. I'm stretching. Correct me please. I've always been confused about this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I suppose you could come up with an experiment where the alive/dead superposition could interfere and have some result that could be measured, but I can't think of one right now. We can only measure alive or dead because those are the eigenstates of the system; once we open the box, we collapse the wave function. But until we've done that, or there has been some other interaction that does it, we have a superposition of states.

 

The purpose behind this thought experiment is to illustrate the weirdness of quantum mechanics.

 

Here's my attempt from a few years back (2005):

 

What if you had two cats in the box, one male and one female. After, say, 10 minutes a decay device will trigger one of them dead in a way that won't effect the other. (Say it triggers a cyanide capsule to rupture in the stomach).

 

So you have a live/dead cat and another live/dead cat. Can they interfere with each other?

 

Assume there is enough food and water in the box/system and half the box was isolated/compartmented so the cats can't get to it because of a trap door than wasn't (quite) big enough.

 

After a year the trap door is sealed and the isolation/compartment is saved and the remaining half is jettisoned into a black hole.

 

When the isolation/compartment is opened could it contain any kittens?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In the single cat thought experiment would it make a difference if the measurement were initiated by the cat?

 

That's a topic of discussion by some, but it goes well beyond the scope of the original thought experiment.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thank you J.C.,

It was an interesting book, but I meant the "well beyond the scope of the original thought experiment" part.

I thought I understood it as far as I was capable, so I expected a cat initiated test, (although I didn't know why) would likely have the same results as every other similar thought experiment. If there's more to be considered along these lines, I'm terribly interested, but I don't want to change the subject of this thread.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

if we always collapse the wave function while measuring it how can we say that it was at the superposition of some states & not that state themselves?

 

Because there are experiments you can do with superpositions that show interference of the states, which would not occur if the system were in just one state.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.