Jump to content

Have scientists agreed on how many dimensions exist in the universe?


A Tripolation

Recommended Posts

Ok, as I was advised to tell you all so as to avoid undesirable responses, I have looked around on wikipedia and google for an answer, but I can't understand any of it. I'm an english major that likes science, and as such I cannot comprehend anything about the M-Theory or String theory or the other stuff that pops up in searches.

 

Is there definitley more dimensions than the three that we know of? Is time considered the fourth dimension? And if so, does that mean that entities that reside in this dimension could manipulate time as we manipulate the spatial dimensions (hypothetically speaking)?

 

Could we live or even travel to higher dimensions? Or could higher-dimension beings travel hereto our world?

 

Any information or links to explanatory sites would be greatly appreciated. Thanks!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think to travel into other dimentions mite destroy our body into vapor will be a trama.

If other dimentions exist then ghosts exist also afterlife ?.

 

Dimentions like saying that on the other side there are duplicate copies of ourselves which is bunk imagination.:doh:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Tolmosoff, i thin you're taking the sci-fi definition of dimension a bit too seriously.

 

we haven't reached a conclusion on how many dimensions the universe has because we have as yet been unable to devise an experiment capable of telling us how many dimensions there are.

 

It is possible the the LHC will provide some clues however and allow us to construct an experiment explicitly to determine the universes dimensionality.

 

currently it is taken as 4 dimentions. the proposed extra dimensions are a bit wierd as they are supposed to be 'curled up' i myself have no idea how this is supposed to work so i'm going to default to the people who say this is a possibility.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I hope we don't find the ( After Life ) dimention.

 

Scientists say that we live in a parallel world where we have duplicates of ourselves.:doh:

Where do they get this crap from ?.:eek:

 

So if then I die one day do they actually believe our duplicate dies on the same day ?.

Those guys are jokes that live on our money. So they mite find that monkey that gave birth to us ?.

They make a big joke out of Darwins idea.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ok, first off, disregard everything Tolsomoff is saying.

 

If the universe has more than 4 dimensions, than we do "reside in" them. We certainly reside in 4. (I assume it took you some finite amount of time to compose your question?) Dimension does not equal some "other place." It's an other direction.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

...Is there definitley more dimensions than the three that we know of? Is time considered the fourth dimension?...

 

We don't know that there are more than three spatial dimensions.

Right now the fuzzy consensus pendulum is actually swinging towards there NOT being any extra spatial dimensions.

 

The biggest event in that particular controversy was the last 12 minutes of a July 7 talk at CERN (geneva switzerland) by nobel laureate Steven Weinberg.

He was working on a nonstring idea that he invented in 1979 and has had a big resurgence of interest and which allows what he called "good old Quantum Field Theory" (just 3 spatial dimensions, no strings) to work, and be fundamental after all.

 

If that works out there is no need to dream up extra spatial dimensions. Heard of Occam's razor?

 

So the pendulum swings, and physics hasn't yet made up her mind.

 

Time is a separate issue. The FQXi institute just had an essay contest on the topic What is Time? and the prize essays all happened to argue that time does not exist as a geometric dimensions but is something that somehow "emerges" at large scale. they were against the "block universe" concept.

But the pendulum swings on that one too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If the universe has more than 4 dimensions, than we do "reside in" them.

 

Not necessarily. There are quite plausible extra dimension theories where Standard Model fields are constrained to a 4-dimensional surface (the "brane") while gravity (and possibly other exotic stuff) is free to explore the whole space (the "bulk").

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not necessarily. There are quite plausible extra dimension theories where Standard Model fields are constrained to a 4-dimensional surface (the "brane") while gravity (and possibly other exotic stuff) is free to explore the whole space (the "bulk").

 

Fair enough - I don't pretend to understand string theory. But still, the dimensions wouldn't be some "other place," right? It would just be directions in which most aspects of us (except for gravity, etc.) have zero extension, just as if we encountered a 2D flatlander drifting around our 3D space. Or am I way off?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Fair enough - I don't pretend to understand string theory. But still, the dimensions wouldn't be some "other place," right? It would just be directions in which most aspects of us (except for gravity, etc.) have zero extension, just as if we encountered a 2D flatlander drifting around our 3D space. Or am I way off?

 

Not on the same (gravity) point, but another way for us to be unaware of a dimension would be if we were fully extended or immersed in it. We couldn't move in that direction, because we are already there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

By manipulate I mean that we can control something to an extent. Im sorry, I dont really know enough science to convey my thoughts well. Like Im thinking, time only flows in one direction, but if we were able to manipulate it as we do spatial things, we could stop it or reverse it or do whatever we wish with it, right?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

By manipulate I mean that we can control something to an extent. Im sorry, I dont really know enough science to convey my thoughts well. Like Im thinking, time only flows in one direction, but if we were able to manipulate it as we do spatial things, we could stop it or reverse it or do whatever we wish with it, right?

 

Well, can you "manipulate" a spatial dimension? No. You can move an object through one, but what does that actually mean? It means the object's position in a spatial dimension changes with respect to its position in the time dimension. Any motion, i.e. "manipulation," involves both space and time already.

 

So how can time "stop" or "reverse?" Both of those verbs take place within time. To "stop" just means a border between the time when something is happening and a time when it isn't.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

But still, the dimensions wouldn't be some "other place," right? It would just be directions in which most aspects of us (except for gravity, etc.) have zero extension, just as if we encountered a 2D flatlander drifting around our 3D space.

 

Yes. Though you could imagine that maybe there is another brane out there which also has the Standard Model on it. If it were parallel to our own, its 4 dimensions would be the same dimensions as our own, but it would appear to be an "other place" - somewhere that you can't get to from our own space, but need to make an interdimensional jump to get to. (It would have to be a fairly long jump otherwise we would feel its gravity.)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 5 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.