Jump to content

Ionic (URGENTNTTNT) ahah


Recommended Posts

1.Why the chemical formula of an ionic compound shows [the types of ions present and the ratio of one type ion to other ]differently from the chemical formula of covalent compound ( molecule )shows [acutal number of atoms of element]??

2.Why aren't ionic compound not molecules?

:eek::eek:

 

Seek for your helps :P

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In an ionic solid all the atoms are bonded to all the atoms around it. This is true thorught the entire solid, so in effect everything is bonded together. If you used to number of actual atoms in the chemical formula you'd be using rather large numbers in the billions, which would make the formula rather long winded. Using ratios just makes things so much simplier. If you need to know how big the solid is you can say it has blah blah number of moles in it, which is a far easier way of doing things.

 

as for the second question, the term molecule is used rather loosly for ionic compounds. When describing the type of solid you can have giant ionic, giant molecule, as well as ionic and molecule, which means different things. But you can use the term "a molecule of sodium chloride" sodium chloride being an ionic solid. So i'd use the term molecule in relation to ionic compounds loosly, it can sorta apply but it can also sorta not apply, if you see what i mean (which may be difficult :confused: )

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In an ionic solid all the atoms are bonded to all the atoms around it. This is true thorught the entire solid' date=' so in effect everything is bonded together. If you used to number of actual atoms in the chemical formula you'd be using rather large numbers in the billions, which would make the formula rather long winded. Using ratios just makes things so much simplier. If you need to know how big the solid is you can say it has blah blah number of moles in it, which is a far easier way of doing things.

 

as for the second question, the term molecule is used rather loosly for ionic compounds. When describing the type of solid you can have giant ionic, giant molecule, as well as ionic and molecule, which means different things. But you can use the term "a molecule of sodium chloride" sodium chloride being an ionic solid. So i'd use the term molecule in relation to ionic compounds loosly, it can sorta apply but it can also sorta not apply, if you see what i mean (which may be difficult :confused: )[/quote']

 

Thanks

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ionic Compounds are made by electronic attraction, and, therefore, break back into the original ions (Na+ and Cl- for Sodium Chloride) when dissolved into water or amphiprotic solvent. All acids and Bases work on this principle. Covalent Molecules are actually individual molecules, and are bonded by their valance electorn configuration. Ionic Compounds are different in the sense that they are... yeah... just ratios... but covalent molecules are actually individuals.

 

How does one actually differentiate an ionic from covalent using only the name? Is there a proper way... or is it memorization of formulas. I know about ions and stuff... but not too much... anyone got anythin on this?

 

Cheerz

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How does one actually differentiate an ionic from covalent using only the name?

what do you mean by using only the name. Something like "iron oxide"? The name of the compound? There is no real way. its just the formula and what you know about electronic configurations and all!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

you just recognize the components in the compound

 

which means that you are not able to tell whether they are bonded covalently or ionically. This then leads to your knowledge of electronic configuration. You can then work it out!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

it's all relative to one's opinion, really. every covalent bond that doesn't involve two of the same element is polar. every polar covalent bond is partially ionic. every ionic bond is partially polar covalent. a fully ionic bond is an oxymoron. if there is no sharing of the electrons involved, it's not a bond; rather, it's the transfer of electrons. the 1.7 rule is linus pauling's opinion, and what chemists use today.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

although 1.7 isnt held as hard fact......it varys. especially depending on which country and the quality of teaching on what figure your given.....

Pauling's opnion is only held in high regard because he came up with the "pauling scale for electronegavity"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ionic compounds typically exist as a solid, when heated they decompose yielding cation and anion gases.

 

What you are referring to are molecular compounds, covalent compounds refer to such as graphite. The bond between ionic compounds are between the cations and anions...the elements themselves while molecular compounds form intermolecular bonds, molecule to molecule attractions.

 

Ionic compounds are not molecules because they exist as elemental attractions in which they form crystal lattices.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ionic compounds typically exist as a solid, when heated they decompose yielding cation and anion gases.

ionic compounds tend to be between metals and halogens or nonmetal polyatomic ions. thus, they tend to not yield cation gases since the boiling points of metals are quite high.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.