Jump to content

Imaginary Calculus


NorthWind

Recommended Posts

First off, mornin' ladies and gentlemen of Science Forums. I'm currently an AP Calculus student, and I've noticed that the College Board curriculum for calculus is kept strictly to real numbers.

So that got me wondering: can you have imaginary calculus? I would guess that the answer is yes; if so, are the rules the same as real calculus?

 

I did some messing around with f(z) = (z + zi). I haven't done anything with imaginary numbers for a while, but I think the graph of this would be a vector with a constant slope i? (Can you take slopes on the imaginary plane like a linear function?) I tried to find a derivative of z+zi that equaled i and found that if I took the derivative of zi over the derivative of z (zi's derivative being i; z's derivative being 1) I get i. So I did this like a parametric.

 

Is any of this correct?

 

Thanks,

N

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you consider i to be a constant, and you can do calculus with constants, then you should have no trouble doing calculus with imaginary numbers.

 

That's what I was thinking. I would treat i as a constant(after all, it is :P).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Complex Analysis is not that simple... deals withs residues and poles etc and criteria for functions that are analytical... if u treat z as a real constant u are missing a whole lot. Good luck...

 

I'm kind of confused by this response because who said complex analysis was simple and who said to treat z as a constant? i is a constant, but obviously not z = x + yi. :confused:

 

Furthermore, I agree completely with what Snail wrote... especially in light of your last post where you actually used u as a variable! Though you didn't define what u, v, y, or w was...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

my point was that complex analysis deals with many different topics that the poster ignoring and is worth learning more about. ie residues , poles etc


Merged post follows:

Consecutive posts merged

f(z) = u(x,y) + iv(x,y) for those math guys so apply Cauchy riemann equations to that....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

my point was that complex analysis deals with many different topics that the poster ignoring and is worth learning more about. ie residues , poles etc


Merged post follows:

Consecutive posts merged

f(z) = u(x,y) + iv(x,y) for those math guys so apply Cauchy riemann equations to that....

 

OK, that's fine, but again no one wrote that it was easy or to treat z as a constant, so it was kind of a weird response to the thread.

 

Also, you still didn't actually define what w was. I'm sure it was a typo (since it doesn't really make any sense), but it is still bad form to just leave any variables undefined -- especially as the OP is an obvious beginner. At least link to a source with more complete information, like linking to: http://mathworld.wolfram.com/Cauchy-RiemannEquations.html

Might be nice to say a word or two about them (like, C-R equations come from differentiating a complex function f(z) with respect to z = x + yi i.e. with respect to dz = dx + dyi.

 

Finally, this forum does have a LaTeX capability that will make the math easier to write and read: a la

 

[math]\frac{\partial u}{\partial x} = \frac{\partial v}{\partial y}[/math] and

[math]\frac{\partial u}{\partial y} = -\frac{\partial v}{\partial x}[/math]

 

much nicer looking than trying to write out "partial derivatives" where necessary and write the fractions using only ()'s and the / key.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.