liber_scientia Posted December 19, 2008 Share Posted December 19, 2008 Really. Why? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gilded Posted December 19, 2008 Share Posted December 19, 2008 I'm afraid that falls within the realm of philosophy. Feel free to discuss "How?" though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DrP Posted December 19, 2008 Share Posted December 19, 2008 Or "What?" could be a good start? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Royston Posted December 19, 2008 Share Posted December 19, 2008 Really. Why? Because I said so. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iNow Posted December 19, 2008 Share Posted December 19, 2008 Z. Now, we're done. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sisyphus Posted December 19, 2008 Share Posted December 19, 2008 How about just, "huh?" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phi for All Posted December 19, 2008 Share Posted December 19, 2008 Really. Why?No reason. Seriously, try this answer out for all why-type questions. It works. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
npts2020 Posted December 19, 2008 Share Posted December 19, 2008 No reason. Seriously, try this answer out for all why-type questions. It works. Or you could take the parents' line......'cause I said so. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YT2095 Posted December 19, 2008 Share Posted December 19, 2008 Because it`s There. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phi for All Posted December 20, 2008 Share Posted December 20, 2008 Or you could take the parents' line......'cause I said so.That's what Snail said in post #4, and he's not a parent, apparently. But "No reason" works for, "Why do bad things happen to good people?" as well as, "Why did George Bush get elected twice?" The difference is in whether you shrug your shoulders or tap your skull when saying, "No reason". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
liber_scientia Posted December 21, 2008 Author Share Posted December 21, 2008 Apparently. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thedarkshade Posted December 21, 2008 Share Posted December 21, 2008 Really. Why? Why not! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aguy2 Posted December 30, 2008 Share Posted December 30, 2008 Really. Why? I have been contending that the large scale meaning and purpose of reality is what I have been calling either "Self-Creation" or, of late, "Self-Engenderment". With "Self-Engenderment" being defined as, "giving rise to itself without assistance". see http://www.self-engenderment.com aguy2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
john5746 Posted December 30, 2008 Share Posted December 30, 2008 Really. Why? No. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cap'n Refsmmat Posted December 31, 2008 Share Posted December 31, 2008 Really. Why? Penguin. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
J.C.MacSwell Posted January 6, 2009 Share Posted January 6, 2009 Really. Why? cause also be Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JohnB Posted January 7, 2009 Share Posted January 7, 2009 Really. Why? Can't answer until you tell me who and when. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
the tree Posted January 12, 2009 Share Posted January 12, 2009 The correct answer is for the LULZ. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now