Jump to content

What... if light speed: 10m/s ???


fatoumata

Recommended Posts

hi guys!!

 

I recently learned about Newton's laws and at a moment, the teacher told us that the Newton's first law(a body continues to maintain its state of rest or uniform motion unless acted upon by an external unbalanced force)is always true unless the studied system has a speed near, = or > to light speed; So now I wonder if light speed was 10m/s, how would the world look like and how would Newton's laws be changed?:confused:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

:D Well, I'm not much of a physicist, but I can tell you two things: a) in this case the ">" part is rubbish, or at least I'm pretty sure, and b) the universe would be a LOT slower. But this is an interesting question; I guess the human race wouldn't see a difference, since the electrons in our brains would be slowed down considerably, from which I deduce that so would our perception of time. But that's just a 16 year old's guess :o)
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why? Not to sound aggressive, but how does the speed of light change distance? The distance should still be the same, just the length of time it would take for one to cross it would, from the perspective of our Universe, be 30 000 000x longer (I think).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, the electrons in our brains will be limited to 10 m/s, which is about 30 000 000x slower than now. Logically, this means that our thinking will be slowed down. But just imagine; a simple calculation that would take you one second in this Universe, such as 16*2, would take you almost a year in that Universe. Relative to our Universe.

 

I wonder if time would actually slow down though. I can think of some reasons why it could, and some why it shouldn't. Anybody got any ideas?

 

Cheers,

 

Shadow

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why? Not to sound aggressive, but how does the speed of light change distance? The distance should still be the same, just the length of time it would take for one to cross it would, from the perspective of our Universe, be 30 000 000x longer (I think).

 

Because a meter is defined as how far light travels in 1⁄299,792,458 of a second.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That depends on how you imagine this fictional Universe. If that Universe were to be exactly the same as ours, except for the speed of light, then that couldn't be; nothing can go faster than light. Information travels at the speed of light. If something moved faster, it'd be going backward in time. Meaning that if electrons moved at their "standard" speeds, whenever we though about something we'd essentially be traveling backwards in time :D

 

Cheers,

 

Gabe

Link to comment
Share on other sites

:eyebrow:this discussion is just interesting since you guys have talked about our perception of distance, sound, thinking now i ask what's about our perception of images? do you think that the speed at which we see images, colors would be slower and why?:doh:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That depends on how you imagine this fictional Universe. If that Universe were to be exactly the same as ours, except for the speed of light, then that couldn't be; nothing can go faster than light. Information travels at the speed of light. If something moved faster, it'd be going backward in time. Meaning that if electrons moved at their "standard" speeds, whenever we though about something we'd essentially be traveling backwards in time :D

 

Cheers,

 

Gabe

Actually, latest theory suggests that light is an irrelevant factor in the theory of relativity.

 

http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg20026801.500-why-einstein-was-wrong-about-relativity.html

Link to comment
Share on other sites

:D Well as I said earlier, I'm not a physicist, and physics isn't exactly my strong area. My posts are based on my deductions, and what little I picked up about physics in my short life time. But thanks for the link, it's an interesting read :)

 

As for the color part, color is light. So you're basically asking the same question all over again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not sure if it is too obvious for you but perhaps I should nit-pick a bit:

The teacher told us that Newton's first law (a body continues to maintain its state of rest or uniform motion unless acted upon by an external unbalanced force) is always true unless the studied system has a speed near, = or > to light speed

If he really said that then your teacher is wrong. Bodies maintaining their states of rest or uniform motion unless there is a force acting on them is supposedly always true. What does change at velocities close to the speed of light is that Newton's prediction of the reaction of a particle on a force becomes bad/wrong.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If the speed of light were 10 m/s and everything else the same, then as pointed out a meter would just be a bigger unit. However, if you changed one of the unitless constants, such as the fine structure constant, then there would be significant differences (notably, a similarly large change would prevent life from being possible).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.