THE FIFTH KNIGH Posted August 1, 2008 Share Posted August 1, 2008 It is already known, that the 'universal language' is mathematics. This is not in question! It is the human preception of this language, that must be presumed as accurate, until verifiable 'empirical' evidence is introduced! This must then become accepted, and applied from the platform of mathematics, and rendered to 'all' branches of science, technology, communications . . . etc., and into the general public domain! CERN LHC programs are our only known hope of an 'Axiom Proof', in all fields of endeavor, and this will not be without extreme risks! http://thefifthknight.blogspot.com/ Remember: Follow the 'White Rabbit'! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iNow Posted August 1, 2008 Share Posted August 1, 2008 If you want to link to your blog, that's super. You may, however, consider adding it to your signature instead. http://www.scienceforums.net/forum/profile.php?do=editsignature Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
THE FIFTH KNIGH Posted August 1, 2008 Author Share Posted August 1, 2008 Thank you for assistance! I have just now added my signature to SF files. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Klaynos Posted August 1, 2008 Share Posted August 1, 2008 Physics doesn't go in much for handwaving language, it likes maths, you can test maths and clearly see when you're wrong... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
THE FIFTH KNIGH Posted August 1, 2008 Author Share Posted August 1, 2008 It is not the universal language of mathematics, that is in question, but the human interpretation of those axiom proofs. We are forced to accept your written formulae, until 'empirical' evidence renders the 'real' verdict! An unfortunate example can be found within General Relativity: not only can the dimensional mass shrink or grow (under certain circumstances), but the measuring devices as well! The human perception is not exempt from flaw, over immense distances. Before running around with our math solutions as gospel, we should anticipate enlightenment from CERN LHC! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Klaynos Posted August 1, 2008 Share Posted August 1, 2008 what do you mean by: until 'empirical' evidence renders the 'real' verdict! The maths is the REAL verdict that's what the empirical evidence shows. And frankly putting empirical in quotes is an insult. CERN will create more data that will be compared to more equations and hopefully aid our derivation of new ones... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
THE FIFTH KNIGH Posted August 2, 2008 Author Share Posted August 2, 2008 With half of the 'Standard Model' missing, shrouded within a mathematical haze of pure speculation (intelligent guessing); there is absolutely no way of telling which parts are accurate! However, for now it is all we have to work with! empirical (no insult intended). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now