Jump to content

Isolated Atom?


ChemSiddiqui

Recommended Posts

No, i am quite sure its isolated atom. here is an abstract from wikipedia:

 

"

 

Isolated atoms

Atomic physics always considers atoms in isolation - i.e. a model will consist of a single nucleus which may be surrounded by one or more bound electrons. It is not concerned with the formation of molecules (although much of the physics is identical) nor does it examine atoms in a solid state as condensed matter. It is concerned with processes such as ionization and excitation by photons or collisions with atomic particles.

 

While modelling atoms in isolation may not seem realistic, if one considers atoms in a gas or plasma then the time-scales for atom-atom interactions are huge in comparison to the atomic processes that we are concerned with. This means that the individual atoms can be treated as if each were in isolation because for the vast majority of the time they are. By this consideration atomic physics provides the underlying theory in plasma physics and atmospheric physics even though both deal with huge numbers of atoms.

 

Additionally, the properties of an atom in isolation is different from that of individual atoms in relatively close proximity to each other. This is because medium and long range forces come into play with proximity. "

 

can some1 explain now Please, i can't still get it in my head.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sounds to me like an "isolated atom" is just a subjectively attributed ideal state that some people use to make modelling of atoms simpler, and that in the real world, atoms ARE acted upon by other atoms and forces, so are never really isolated. It's just that sometimes it's treated as "isolated" to make thought experiments and modelling easier.

 

 

That's just how I interpreted your wiki quote above. This is not necessarily what it means. All the best.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The quote is basically as I described it above. It's an idealization of no external influences.

 

As an example with which I am quite familiar, the second is defined as 9192631770 oscillations of the hyperfine states of an isolated cesium-133 atom. That's because collisions and stray electric and magnetic fields will all give rise to errors because they change the frequency.

 

So you define it for an isolated atom, and then try and quantify all of the perturbations (collision shift, Stark shift and Zeeman shift from the three examples I gave)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

the second is defined as 9192631770 oscillations of the hyperfine states of an isolated cesium-133 atom. That's because collisions and stray electric and magnetic fields will all give rise to errors because they change the frequency.

 

So you define it for an isolated atom, and then try and quantify all of the perturbations (collision shift, Stark shift and Zeeman shift from the three examples I gave)

 

can I have Fries with that?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.