Jump to content

Mars Colonies- sooner than we may think?


Rasori

Recommended Posts

Now, this is another one of my crazy schemes, but I figured I have to ask.

 

I saw a show not too long ago on how we plan to colonize Mars. They said that we'd have to thicken and heat the atmosphere. One of the main plans for how was to extract carbon from the soil and release it into the atmosphere, then, once it warmed enough, begin the process of bringing plants.

 

If this carbon plan is true, then can't we make it twice as fast?

 

I was searching before and I came across this site. It says:

Mars' atmosphere is composed mostly of carbon dioxide, which accounts for 96% of the total.

 

So, why can't we put machines on Mars that heat up the CO2 enough to seperate the carbon from the oxygen, and do two things at once? Not only do we heat the atmosphere, but we make it more hospitable!

 

I don't know, I'm probably just crazy (don't feel bad telling me that I am), but it seems like the easiest and quickest solution.

 

What say you?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here's a little project for you:

 

Using the radius of Mars, and the depth and density of the atmosphere, calculate the volume of CO2 that needs to be heated. Then work out how much energy it would take to heat that volume from its current temperature to that at which the CO2 disassociates.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

I think that a colonization of mars that would entail changing the atmosphere is out of the question. I dont think they would take the chance of messing things up. The most you could ever hope for on mars would be a Space station and maybe other structures. There would be no going outdoors

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...
Here's a little project for you:

 

Using the radius of Mars' date=' and the depth and density of the atmosphere, calculate the volume of CO[sub']2[/sub] that needs to be heated. Then work out how much energy it would take to heat that volume from its current temperature to that at which the CO2 disassociates.

 

My point was going to be based on this, but you said it a great deal better.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

'']My point was going to be based on this, but you said it a great deal better.

It occurs to me he'd get a bigger result than he should with that calculation, because it doesn't account for any density gradient. Any ideas?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree about what you guys said with changing Mars' atmosphere. It doesn't sound too possible, but I have to say - we cannever know what's in for us at the future.

 

I agree that it would be a MISTAKE to change Mars' atmosphere, at least until we figure out what exactly is the natural balance on mars (and I'm not speaking about what the Marsian Rats have for breakfast..)

 

I do think that colonization in terms of a space station is possible, and I'd dare say that we might even see it in our life time still. We have some of the technology, and we definately have the will.. I think that those things actually will happen = and sooner than most of us think. But I think the Moon will be colonized sooner.

 

Though I wouldn't exactly call it colonization if it's actually a space station with researchers and computers on it...

 

~moo

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It occurs to me he'd get a bigger result than he should with that calculation, because it doesn't account for any density gradient. Any ideas?

 

If you did it over the first 1 km then you get a rough idea of how hard it would be with only a small amount of atmosphere and an (approximately) constant density. Or use some kind of average density.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

it would be important to know if Mars has magnetic poles too. as mentioned above, there would be no protection against solar winds without it!

and making one would be just ridiculous if not impossible.

 

Water Bears might survive on Mars though, but you`de need alot of them to actualy say it was "collonised" and even then, I`m fairly sure they would be in a dormant state.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So is it true that earth's magnetic field is weakning, to flip soon or something like that. Wonder if that will matter with the flares, or would we have others things to worry about :confused: Sorry for being off topic

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There was a thing about the pole shifting in a recent Science magazine, I didn't read it properly though. Something about it being a gradual process that starts in the upper atmosphere and so there's less chance of everything getting cooked.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.