Jump to content

Whats the difference?


shygurl475

Recommended Posts

  • 2 weeks later...

Well, it's a molecule for sure, but most definitions of a compound say that it contains two or more elements. I guess there might be some ambiguity in the definition though.

 

Both. you can't get a compound without it being molecular.

 

Actually, I have to quibble with this too; sodium chloride is ionic, not molecular (there are no molecules containing one sodium and one chlorine, just a crystal lattice of sodium and chloride ions). But few would hesitate to call NaCl a compound.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

molecules have no trouble being ionic. the fact that there is an immense amount of intermolecular bonding making up a lattice is also par for the course.

 

on thing you notice about chemistry is that there is always an exception to a definition, even this one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's not what it says here:

This definition has evolved as knowledge of the structure of molecules has increased. Earlier definitions were less precise defining molecules as the smallest particles of pure chemical substances that still retain their composition and chemical properties.[3] This definition often breaks down since many substances in ordinary experience, such as rocks, salts, and metals, are composed of atoms or ions, but are not made of molecules.

Emphasis mine. I realize Wikipedia is not the last word, but this is consistent with what I've read elsewhere.

 

Now, there is a situation where the term "molecule" is used in a looser sense, according to the same article:

In the kinetic theory of gases the term molecule is often used for any gaseous particle regardless of their composition.[4] According to this definition noble gases would also be considered molecules despite the fact that they are composed of a single non-bonded atom.

However, this has little relevance to the topic at hand.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There is also a disparity between the definitions and common usage. If you asked most chemists what was in a salt molecule they would go 'sodium and chlorine' but if they were writing a paper on it they would likely reffer to salt crystals as sodium chloride lattices.

 

and anyway, lattices can be molecules also. look at diamonds.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

and anyway, lattices can be molecules also. look at diamonds.

Not the same kind of lattice as sodium chloride, though. Salt crystals are ionic; diamonds (and graphite, for that matter) are covalent, so they could be viewed as giant molecules, though the article I linked seems to be less than keen on describing them as such:

No typical molecule can be defined for ionic (salts) and covalent crystals (network solids) which are composed of repeating unit cells that extend either in a plane (such as in graphite) or three-dimensionally (such as in diamond or sodium chloride).
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.