ydoaPs Posted August 7, 2007 Share Posted August 7, 2007 That wouldn't really fit with any regularly used definition of '+' then would it? Roman Numerals I+I=II That wouldn't really fit with any regularly used definition of '+' then would it? Roman Numerals I+I=II Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BenTheMan Posted August 11, 2007 Share Posted August 11, 2007 hmmm 1 + 1 = 0 mod 1 or 1 + 1 = 0 mod 2. There. There's two cases. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
martianxx Posted November 6, 2007 Share Posted November 6, 2007 no there is a way where you start if assuming that A=B or somrthing, ill find out tommorow. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
h4tt3n Posted November 6, 2007 Share Posted November 6, 2007 I'm sorry... Isn't the fact that 1+1 = 2 derived empirically? As in " When I put one nut in the sack and then another nut, then I got two nuts in the sack." And logic is then a generalized system based on the above and similar empirically derived non-disputable facts? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bascule Posted November 7, 2007 Share Posted November 7, 2007 [math]suc0 + suc0 = sucsuc0[/math] proof: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
insane_alien Posted November 7, 2007 Share Posted November 7, 2007 if it is vector addition the value could be anywhere between 0 and 2. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
qabawe Posted February 2, 2008 Share Posted February 2, 2008 1+1 =2 this is true if 1=1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thedarkshade Posted February 2, 2008 Share Posted February 2, 2008 Yeah, I've seen stuff like that too! There is just one trick, dividing by zero. Just out numbers instead of variables and you will see that it actually doesn't work! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
blike Posted February 2, 2008 Share Posted February 2, 2008 Goodness people. Here you are bored_teen: http://mathforum.org/library/drmath/view/57110.html http://mathworld.wolfram.com/Fallacy.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
timo Posted February 2, 2008 Share Posted February 2, 2008 You'd possibly better mail it to him, because: Bored_teen is a decent person bored_teen bored_teen is offline Last Activity: 08-01-2007 08:52 AM Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
blike Posted February 2, 2008 Share Posted February 2, 2008 You'd possibly better mail it to him, because: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bored_teen Posted June 12, 2008 Author Share Posted June 12, 2008 You'd possibly better mail it to him, because: hehe i'm back. i got it. thanks everybody! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alchemist Posted June 16, 2008 Share Posted June 16, 2008 1+1=10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
omnimutant Posted June 16, 2008 Share Posted June 16, 2008 I was going to say, when the first 1 = one apple and the other 1 = one orange then you have 1+1 = Fruit Salad! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scienceguy69 Posted June 16, 2008 Share Posted June 16, 2008 oh hey you guys i heard this forum was the place to be so i decided to join... to the point 1+1 obviously = 2 what are you on about /sigh thanks bye Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phi for All Posted June 16, 2008 Share Posted June 16, 2008 oh hey you guys i heard this forum was the place to be so i decided to join... to the point 1+1 obviously = 2 what are you on about /sigh thanks byeJoining with two accounts is against the rules. I doubt your sincerity and you have a big strike against you, especially since your other account has already started calling people "idiots". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
john5746 Posted June 16, 2008 Share Posted June 16, 2008 1+1=10 Obviously, 1 + 1 = 11. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
the tree Posted June 16, 2008 Share Posted June 16, 2008 So, a quick summary of when [imath]1+1\neq 2[/imath]. When your working modulo <2 When by '+' you don't mean 'plus'As the logical operator AND, which I've always seen written as '^' which seems an awful lot less confusing. But write it however you like, whatever. (you'll note that I never challenged this) When you chose it to mean something completely random, which is okay, just boring. [*]When by '1' and '2' you don't mean '1' and '2'. This is stupid. (a 'I' doesn't look like a '1', srsly)[*]When you apply a fallacious 'proof', this is mega stupid.[*]When you are otherwise being stupid, or boring. Unless I've missed something, can we call this concluded? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alchemist Posted June 17, 2008 Share Posted June 17, 2008 1+1 = 10 There are 10 kinds of people: those that can read binary codes and those that can't! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted June 24, 2008 Share Posted June 24, 2008 Unless I've missed something, can we call this concluded? Yes please. This thread should have been closed a looong time ago. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts