Jump to content

Flaming Darwin's theory


Recommended Posts

danmoore80 said in post #9 :

today’s science is tomorrow’s superstition

 

haven`t you got that a little bit ass backwards?

 

"weak. So are you agreeing then, that the Bible, thus far, has never been proved wrong?"

 

indeed a good many points RE: "The Bible" have been proven wrong!

and since the word Bible comes from the word "Biblia" meaning Many Books, I can see how your type get around this argument, and it`s ceratinly NOT by Logic as we understand it to be, it`s more a lesson in semantics, and not a game that many of us are likely to play!

if you want genuine answers, then ask SPECIFIC Questions, else your just wasting everyones time including your own :(

think about it a little :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

made the entire universe last tuesday

 

i like this religion, i will incorporate it into my life.

 

Dan, if you have faith, don't worry about proof. Would you still have faith if you KNEW all science pointed against your beliefs? If you quickly agree to this, then say BUT-- I CAN proove it----- maybe the values you think drive you to say such things are not as solid as your consciously aware of.

 

What are your reason's for the beliefs you hold? There is a reason for everything (i think), reason is very important.

 

By the way, to what extent do you believe that evolutionary theory is false? (evolution is pretty complicated (not in function, but in our capability to identify all factors and stuff) so to absolutely discredit every part of it is illogical.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would agree that to discredit evolution completely would be incorrect. I do believe in a form of "evolution" as it is stated scientifically, and that is microevolution. Microevolution has been proven on many occasion, and I do not have a problem with that. I dont' really like the name, because it has "evoluiton" in it, but that's neither here nor there. On the other hand, Macroevoluiton has no grounds. I'm not trying to be argumentative, I am just stating a scientific fact. And for those who say "there is evidence of Macroevolution" look at Dr. Hovind's $250,000 Offer for proof of such.

 

http://www.drdino.com/cse.asp?pg=250k

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Do you still have your faith if macroevolution has evidence? Well it does, it's just denial to say not. I don't fully believe in it because of the beliefs i was raised with and i have reasons for deciding keep them (thus have made my OWN beliefs, well as before i had different reasons for belief). Um, here i realize there is no point in this dialouge so nevermind.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

danmoore80 said in post # :

Find and quote any reputable scientist that claims "there are fossils that prove macroevolution"

 

science does not do proof like that. However many scientists would agree that the fossil record provides overwhelming evidence for evolution. There are a number of transitional series which are very clear.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why do these people insist on focusing so much of their free time picking apart theories that they don't understand in the vague hope people will suddenly stop believing what they are taught in school and just believe in the contents of there own particular doctrine? Isn't that just a little creepy? Why don't they focus some effort into substanciating there doctrines without referring to 'random theory AF0311'? That's just screaming 'I've got deep emotional conflicts with my own belief system, someone please help me!' .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
Guest Meatros
danmoore80 said in post # :

I would agree that to discredit evolution completely would be incorrect. I do believe in a form of "evolution" as it is stated scientifically, and that is microevolution. Microevolution has been proven on many occasion, and I do not have a problem with that. I dont' really like the name, because it has "evoluiton" in it, but that's neither here nor there. On the other hand, Macroevoluiton has no grounds. I'm not trying to be argumentative, I am just stating a scientific fact. And for those who say "there is evidence of Macroevolution" look at Dr. Hovind's $250,000 Offer for proof of such.

 

http://www.drdino.com/cse.asp?pg=250k

 

Did...did... you just site Kent Hovind?

 

.... :lame:

 

Your credibility, if you have any, has now gone straight to zero.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Mooey:

 

"Well I will do that out of curiousity, but if he's having anything to do with creationism I don't REALLY think I have to actually look him up to form a general opinion"

 

And you're going to take my word on it?

 

The name was unfamiliar to me, to be fair went to his web site, but did not take me long and doubt it would waste much of your time

Link to comment
Share on other sites

its insecure people like that doctor who believe that fossils we uncover are just a small selection of gods pottery.

occums razor my friend, when the japanese bombed pearl harbor, we knew they wanted war, not to exchange pleasantries.

if we take a brief look at the most obvious answer, if evolution exists in any form, thus it should be evolution on a planetary scale. Gods 'creations' were perfect in design; wouldnt that mean they could not evolve if they were perfect?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I said i'll look it up, I didn't say i'm going to thrash the person because what you said, give me a TINSY BIT of credit here.

 

I also said that *if he does have anything to do with creationism* (stress the IF HE DOES part) i don't need to REALLY look it up -- I meant I can just know how valid his "scientific" opinions are.

 

and Hades - I don't really see what oyu mean here. If god created hiumanity with the option to evolve (which is a fair statement) it's copmletely irrelevant, because it gives me only the tautological answer of "because thats what happened, BECAUSE!!" and nothing more.

 

If god really created humanity and then "left it alone" to see what happens, you can also call him The Big Bang and explain it by using scientifical thinking.

 

~moo

Link to comment
Share on other sites

mooeypoo said in post # :

I said i'll look it up, I didn't say i'm going to thrash the person because what you said, give me a TINSY BIT of credit here.

 

I also said that *if he does have anything to do with creationism* (stress the IF HE DOES part) i don't need to REALLY look it up -- I meant I can just know how valid his "scientific" opinions are.

 

Snipped out the part that seems to apply to me

 

I am giving you credit, if it's me you were addressing, or would not have suggested you look him up yourself. But the phrasing above was ambiguous and I went with the meaning that occurred to me, which was the more rhetorical, and so felt should restate the suggestion

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.