Jump to content

Scientific Bogeymen


Atellus

Recommended Posts

Following on from the thread on elective technological augmentation of humans (discussing the Singularity) and other conversations about the social acceptability of merging computers with the human body in the real world, it occured to me to try drawing up a list of the current "scientific bogeymen" that occupy, rightly or wrongly, the public consciousness. Here's what I've got so far:

 

- Human Cloning

- Designer Babies

- GM food

- Embryonic stem cell research

- Artificially Intelligent machines at or beyond human equivalence

- Nuclear power generation (waste products)

 

Several of these are related, but in the media are generally segregated. I thought of including the controversy over the MMR vaccine and related incidences, but evidence seems to be emerging that this really was just a public relations scare with no data to back up the medical concerns.

 

This was 30 seconds brain storming. I'm sure I've left out alot so would anyone else care to contribute and see what we can come up with?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Anything that sounds like "mad science" will be treated as such at first. Hence, nuclear power, cloning, genetically modified food all produce completely irrational fears in people. The best thing to do is to just ignore all the stupid evangelicals, hippies, and the like, and quietly continue the work in the background, let people benefit from the technologies, and grow accustomed to them. The "outrage" will take care of itself, most of the time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Part of the problem is that advanced science is a *great* source of villains for books, movies, etc. I need to explain where the big nasty monster came from. 50 years ago, I could say nuclear tests or outer space. Today I can say genetic engineering or pollution. Those probably won't work in another 50 years, and writers will be using some other excuse.

 

It basically boils down the fear of the unknown or that which isn't understood.

 

Mokele

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

- Nuclear power generation (waste products)

 

Most of those I understand, but disposing of nuclear wastes is a real problem that we must face before we can accept nuclear power at a greater level. Just ask France, which uses nuclear power for 86% of it's electricity generation (or there abouts). Long term storage is indeed a problem that technology can solve, but I don't think it's 100% there yet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.