Jump to content

sums of series


lavoisier

Recommended Posts

Hi,

I'm unsuccessfully looking for the proof of some sums.

I'm sure they are very well known, so I wonder if some mathematician could redirect me to useful resources on the web, or just give me a hint about where to start for solving them.

 

The first is the famous binomial. If:

 

PP(i) = p^i * (1-p)^(s-i) * s! / ( i! * (s-i)! )

 

with 0<p<1, i and s positive integers, then I know the proof for:

 

Sum(PP(i), i, 0, s) = 1

 

But I can't work out the proof for:

 

Sum(i * PP(i), i, 0, s) = s*p

 

and for:

 

Sum((i-s*p)^2 * PP(i), i, 0 , s) = p*(1-p)*s

 

A related problem leads to the definition of:

 

PR(i) = Product((n*p-j)*(s-j)/((n-j)*(j+1)), j, 0, i-1) * Product((n-n*p-j)/(n-i-j), j, 0, s-i-1)

 

where 0<p<1, 1<=s<=n, s and n positive integers.

 

Here I don't have a clue for any of the three:

 

Sum(PR(i), i, 0, s) = 1

 

Sum(i * PR(i), i, 0, s) = s*p

 

Sum((i-s*p)^2 * PR(i), i, 0 , s) = p*(1-p)*s*(n-s)/(n-1)

 

Any help will be greatly appreciated.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sum((i-s*p)^2 * PR(i), i, 0 , s) = p*(1-p)*s*(n-s)/(n-1)
Your format is really confusing, and I can't tell what you mean.

On these forums we use the LaTeX system to create properly typset equations like this:

[math]\sum_{i=0}^{s} (i-sp)^{2} \times P_R (i) = sp(1-p)\times \frac{n-s}{n-1}[/math]

(I completely guessed that that'd be what you meant, so don't be surprised if it's wrong)

 

You can click on a LaTeX image to see what code was used and I'd recomend reading this tutorial.

 

Thanks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sorry, I'm new in this forum. I didn't mean to confuse anybody. If and when I post new threads I will use LaTex. However, your guess was correct.

 

I've found a partial answer to my question, i.e. the function PR(i) is the hypergeometric distribution, just expressed in a different format.

 

Mathworld explains how the mean and the variance are calculated, starting from the Bernoulli distribution. It looks very easy in that way.

But it also gives for granted that some awful sums are easy to prove, which was my initial doubt.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

To be honest, my knowlege of anything to do with stats is simply appauling. But you've reminded me that there may well be some interesting elements to it and I really ought to learn it by the time I next get to take exams, so thankyou.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.