Jump to content

High School Problem?


Heretic

Recommended Posts

Where I work I have a patron who come in and picks my brain. Usually just politics, riddles or I.Q. Test type questions. Most I chew up and spit out rather quickly and haven't had a problem until now.

 

I admitted to him I was no mathematician but he gave me this problem stating it was only a high school problem, but it took him 2 months to figure out. I took a look at it and it seemed fairly easy but I can't seem to find the right equation or series of to solve for the unknowns. It's been a month and I've been scanning over all my old texts for similiar questions but to no avail.

 

Any help would be greatly appreciated, even just a general point in the right direction. I'd put some of my work up but quite frankly I'm embarrassed as it goes NOWHERE at all.

 

Prob.JPG

 

Thanks in advance.

 

EDIT: Sorry I forgot to add in case you can't tell from my diagram... that's a circle and it's overlapping an equilateral triangle. And you're trying to solve for X. Sorry again about the diagram.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Each side is 16 units.

 

You know that since the sum of the 3 values on the one side equal 16.

 

1 + 2 + 13 = 16

 

That's the easy part so the other sides are equal to:

 

16 - x

 

and

 

16 - 7

 

You can tell from the numbers the circle isn't centered which causes the problems.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

u can join the points where the circle cuts the triangle to the centre of the circle. Then u'll get 3 issoceles triangles in side the original triangle, n x would be the base of one of these issoceles triangles. And then....(i donnu the rest, still thinking)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I started out by adding some labels to your diagram.

 

triangle circle.jpg

 

The red letters are the intersection points of the triangle and the circle and the blue letters are variable for the unknown segments.

 

The length of each of the sides are the same since the triangle is an equilateral.

 

[math]AD = DG = GA = 16[/math]

We will need that later.

 

We will start by solving for W:

 

We can use the theorem that says for two secant lines that intersect outside of a circle the product of the secant line and the exterior segment of one line are equal to the product of the secant line and exterior segment of the other line.

 

[math](AH)(AI) = (AC)(AB)[/math]

 

[math](7+w)(w) = (15)(2)[/math]

 

This gives us:[math]w=3[/math]

 

since

 

[math]v+7+w=16[/math]

 

[math]v+7+3=16[/math]

 

[math]v=6[/math]

 

using the same principle as above for the secant lines from the other angles of the triangle we get:

 

[math](GH)(GI)=(GF)(GE)[/math]

 

[math](6)(13)=(y)(y+x)[/math]

 

[math]y^2 +xy=78[/math] eqtn 1

 

and

 

[math](DC)(DB)=(DE)(DF)[/math]

 

[math](1)(14)=(z)(z+x)[/math]

 

[math]z^2 + xz =14[/math] eqtn 2

 

Solving the length of the side [math]x+y+z=16[/math]

for z

[math]z=16-x-y[/math] eqtn 3

 

plug into eqtn 2

 

[math](16-x-y)^2 + x(16-x-y) =14[/math]

 

gives us

 

[math]y=10-\frac{x}{2}[/math]

plug this into eqtn 3

 

[math]z=16-x-(10-\frac{x}{2})[/math]

 

[math]z=16-x-10+\frac{x}{2}[/math]

 

[math]z=6-\frac{x}{2}[/math]

 

plug these eqtns for y into eqtns 1

 

[math]y^2 +xy=78[/math]

 

[math](10-\frac{x}{2})^2 +x(10-\frac{x}{2})=78[/math]

 

gives us

 

[math]x=2 \sqrt{22}[/math]

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I knew it was some weird rule I couldn't remember. Thanks for all your help, pepperchin. I appreciate the fact you explained your steps so I can clearly see how it's all done.

 

I guess it really was a high school problem, just to prove one theorem. I should probably go through my textbooks again just to remember all that I've forgotten.

 

I'll get back soon with the answer but that seems right to me, if that theorem is true.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sorry I didn't mean to sound like I doubted you.

 

I'm sure it's correct, I just want to work through it myself and find some proofs of that theorem. I'm just quirky like that. I have to see it for myself.

 

I'm still impressed you have knowledge like that at your disposal. Thanks again for your help.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.