Jump to content

some math twisters?


smacker124

Recommended Posts

Okay, I know I got close to this but then I am not sure.

 

Any help is appreciated:

 

Here is the problem:

There is a string of pearls, which has 33 pearls on it. The largest and most expensive one is in the middle. The string of pearl is worth $65,000. Starting from one end, each pearl is worth $100 more than the one before, up to the middle. Starting from the other end, each pearl is worth $150 more than the one before, up to the middle.

 

What is the value of the middle pearl?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 95
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

cool, well i don't really want to just give you the answer, but i will give you some help for your journey :D

 

First off, don't let all the numbers and stuff scare you off, the porblem is essentailly an addition problem. We know this, becuase when the value of all the pearls is added together, we must get the total value of the string. RIght?

 

So, probably the best way to approach the problem is to randomly choose the value of one of the pearls and then discover the value of all the other perls in relation to this one.

 

Cool, lets get started then. Well, from the problem we know that if we start at the middle pearl and move to one side, lets say the right, then the next pearl will be worth $100 less than the middle pearl. The next pearl again will be worth $200 less than the middle pearl and so on until we reach the last pearl in the chain. All in all, after the first pearl we find that there are 16 pearls till the end of the chain, so we have for those 16 pearls, the following, if we arbitrarily set the value of the middle pearl as "x"...

 

(x-100) + (x-200) + ... + (x-1600)

 

so that is the value of the right side of the pearls, not including the middle pearl, right?

 

 

OK, the same proceedure can be used to find the value of the other side of the necklace (the left side in this case), not including the middle pearl.

 

Cool, so after you get this you will have the value of the right side of the necklace, not including teh middle pearl and the value of the left side of the necklace, not including the middle pearl. All that is left is to add up these two values and the value of the middle pearl. This sum should equal the total value of the necklace, in this case $65,000. That is;

 

(value of right side) + (value of left side) + (value of middle pearl) = (total value of necklace)

 

 

well, that is how i would solve it. There are shorter ways of writting all this out, but i don't know if you know what a summation sign is :/ But hopefully that helps, if you have more questions, just ask. Have fun!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not only would it be an expensive necklace but it would also be funny looking. Never the less without knowing the price of atleast one pearl their is no numerical answer. Only an equation which makes the twister no fun for me to try and solve. I hate never getting the answer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I dont understand how. Both sides dont have to start with the same valued first pearl.

 

i could have.

 

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

900

1000

1100

1200

1300

1400

1500

1600

--------------

13.6K

 

 

2300

2150

2100

1950

1800

1650

1500

1350

1200

1050

900

750

600

450

300

150

----------

20.2k

 

13.6k + 20.2k = 33.8k

65k - 33.8k = 31.2k

 

That math is true if the first pearl on each side starts at its incrementing number. 100 for the first side and 150 for the second side. The word problem does not state the value of the first pearl on either side nor does it state the value of any pearl in the whole necklace so where is the refrence point at which you start adding and subtracting.

 

You cant just pick a random number and add 150 to it because your are then guessing. And it says add 150 an 100 up to the middle perl. I does not say including the middle pearl. and if you did include the middle pearl for each side of the necklace then the middle pearl would be 250 more than its previous pearl.

 

So i don think this can be solved. Im sure it could be solved with variable and put into equation form.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well if the question is....

 

What is the value of the middle pearl?

 

Then it can only be 2 answers with the given information

 

1) Not enough info

2) Some equation which im to lazy to work out.

 

Unless its a trick question and there is some wording in the question that im just not picking up on.

 

VendingMenace can you work out the problem for us?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The following is what I have:

left side(100x) : 13,600

right side(150x) : 20,400

Total: 34,000

 

Misc. 65,000 - 34,000 = 31, 000 is that right? (according to VendingMenace's equtation up there)

 

So the middle pearl's value is 31,000 ? Did I make any errors in my math?

 

Squintz, I think there is a little error with your 150x column, you forgot to add on top of 2100 an additional 150 but just added an additional 50

2150

2100

Corrected: 2100, 2250, then 2400

 

Another question I have, since it doesn't give the start numbers on either side. For all you know it started at 200 (100x) and 300(150x) rather then themselves....Would lead to different middle value. This is a tricky problem I guess. Anyone here have a solution to this? An equtation perhaps? Cause I think most likly it requires an equtation since there are variables.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The word problem does not state the value of the first pearl on either side nor does it state the value of any pearl in the whole necklace so where is the refrence point at which you start adding and subtracting.

 

Well, my method is based on the fact that no matter what side you approach the middle pearl from, it must always have the same value. Correct? So, if we assume that the value of the middle pearl is X, we know that the value of the pearl directly to one side of the middle pearl is (x-100) and that the pearl directly to the other side of the middle is (x-150). Using this information we can write an equation for the entire neckace, which we know the value of. Thus, we have 1 equation and 1 unknown -- this means a numerical solution must be possible.

 

VendingMenace can you work out the problem for us?

 

Sure, i will write it all up when i get home and post it for you guys to look at. That will prolly be in like another 3 or 4 hours, but i will do it. cool :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

im sure an equation for finding the value of every pearl is possible but the question was

 

What is the value of the middle pearl?

 

So your method does not answer the question unless you consider the variable x to be a value. Your assuming that the value of the middle pearl will be given but it cant be given because that is the question

Link to comment
Share on other sites

LMAO @ DUKE

 

Ok sorry for the delay ive had computer issues (all the time lol)

 

SO the sum of 33 pearls is equal to $65000

 

So

 

Step One:

On the right hand side we will say after the first term (a1) the difference is an increasment of $100 each time until the midlle (16), And on the Left hand side we will use $150 increasments after the first term (a1).Call R-h side first term a1 and l-h side first term a2.

 

Step Two:

 

a1 = n - 1 x d1

 

a1 being first term of r-h side

n being the total of terms of side a1 which is 16

d being the difference after a1 which is $100

 

so:

a1 = 16 -1 x 100 = $1500

so the first term on r-h side is 1500

 

a2 = n - 1 x (d2 -d1)

 

a2 being first term of l-h side

n same as above

d2 being diff after a2 ($150)

d1 diff after a1 ($100)

 

Bit different but easier than quadractics

 

so:

a2 = 16 - 1 x (150- 100) =$750

 

So the first term of left hand side = $750

 

Final step:

for right hand side:

 

middle term = n - 1 x d 1 + a1

 

= 16 -1 x 100 + 1500 = $3000

 

and solution for left hand side:

 

middle term = n - 16 x d2 + a2

 

= 16 - 1 x 150 + 750 =$3000

 

The most expensive is $3000.

 

Really you only have to do ONE side but im just showing both possibilites here.

 

The long was is inappropriate. This is the best way to solve A.P. binomal equation, and you must learn o use them... i can show you a quadratic if you wish...and just email me or post for any other solutions....gl

Link to comment
Share on other sites

ok, sorry about that other post, i have resized the images now and i will post them.

 

I feel this is a fairly decent explination, i hope it is clear. Anyways, there are a total of three pages, so read them all, and feel free to ask questions on them.

 

Well, without further ado, on with the first page. :D

math1.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.