Jump to content

Infinitie Universes


NavajoEverclear

Recommended Posts

For matter to be three dimensional, would not every particle of it also be three dimensional? So wouldn't there ALWAYS be something smaller? If it is three dimensional, it has a depth in all directions, so it can be broken into smaller pieces (which can be broken intosmaller pieces, and its peices peieces and all following that order, must be made of something smaller (if it is 3 dimensional)). So what if there is a particle (its precises function of frequency or occurance per atom is irrelevant, as it cant be found anyway)----- it explodes from an infintismally (infintisimally dense with infinite smaller particles) small point, then collapses back to that point, and repeats. How about we call this particle A UNIVERSE. We are in one among infinite other, and there are infinite universes within us.

 

I also think this makes sense because how can there be a different type of structure for every particle smaller than the order above it, down through infinity? It would make things much simpler if at a point the structure repeats itself.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's simmilar to my idea, that a universe is a collection of timelines on the 5th dimentional plane and that a sub-space is a collection of universes on the 6th dimentional plane and that the dimentions keep repeating the pattern line, plane, cube, and back to line again over and over.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Much more radical, just wondering. Not a very good book anyway, i dont reccomend it, and your idea makes more sense than the version in that book. What its idea was that there are higher dimensions in space--- 4th, 5th, 6th, 7th, so on---- its a fairly accepted theory that time is the 4th dimension, this book refered to it as an extra spacial dimension. Which may be possible, but is completely incomprehensible, and had no scientific (not even in supporting theoretical concepts) basis.

 

BTW, didn't mean to offend you or anything, like saying you couldn't think it up on your own, i was just wondering cuz i rememer reading it. I'm sure that every one of my ideas must have been thought of by someone else (multiple seperate people likely), who just didn't make the idea popular.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Good you aren't mad.

 

So what does everyone think about universes being the base structure of particles? As i said, the reason i think it makes sense is because how, or why would there be a unique different type of particle to compose every other smaller particle, infinately? It would be simpler if the order repeats itself.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Standard concepts like there must be something smaller break down below a Planck length, where structures collapse into energy. Below a Planck, normal laws of physics simply don't apply, so you can't reason that a solid entity 1 unit across could be divided into 2 entities .5 units across; it would collapse into energy.

 

Some numbers:

1 Planck Length: lp = sqrt((:h:G)/c3) = 1.6*10-35m

 

Radius of an electron: 2.8*10-15m

Radius of a hydrogen atom: 5.29*10-10m

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest clifford zagnut

Look,

 

1 Planck Length: lp = sqrt((G)/c3) = 1.6*10-35m

 

Here are some numbers for you!

 

xy=27

yz=0

xz=316

yh=136

xh=324

 

Tesseract!, say it out loud you have been owned Ho. So don't make me throw down and smack yo azz up. Hollah......

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I didn't see an additional dimension but an addition of some rotational coordinates.

I also don't think your comments help present your ideas, but I'm tempted to judge your character by them.

Just aman

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You are right i am assuming that, i told my logic why in my first post. Why wouldn't they be made of smaller particle (beside the planck length thing)? my reason for assumption that they are explains why i think they would be. I just don't understand how one particle would be unbreakable (it would be if it had nothing smaller than it). No matter how small, if its three dimensional it has depth in all directions, so how could it not be made of something?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.