Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
nwaogu

A new view for the universe

Recommended Posts

we werent satisfied with what we see in our science books about the universe and its creation and as such we made up our own theory. This is how it goes:

 

during the big bang some particles where made and throw off into space before the others. the ones thrown earlier where thrown below or at the speed of light, the ones thrown later where thrown over the speed of light.

the earlier ones are what we now call the visible part of the universe since light can get up to it and expose it. but the later ones are called the invisible universe since light cant meet up with them.

the invisible universe are what we know today to be the "missing mass", which will one day get visible as their speed reduce to or below the speed of light, this is what the steady state theory misinterpreted, thinking they were newly created atoms, which they arent, thus obeying the law of conservation of mass, that all matter in the universe remains constant.

this missing mass are behind the visible universe since they were thrown out years after the earlier ones,this means that big bang didnt happen in an instant of time thus making them pull the visible particles within since they have huge mass due to their huge speed and without them the universe couldnt have formed at all since all particles will expand rapidly without any formation through cooling.

they will one day pull from without as they overtake other visible entities in the universe and thus forming a forever expanding universe.

the fact is that there are enough mass in the universe to keep it expanding forever and there are thousands of missing mass not yet visible to the eyes.

this is the GRAND theory of everything

 

we believe in the grand theory of everything in which we developed only for the big bang in which we dont still believe happened because for one thing complicated issues might have never happened, and for two things we are strong christians to be precised "Catholic".

 

do you know that the grand theory of everything you see above contradicts or defies the Einstein's Special theory of eveything, that light is the fastest particle in the universe as missing mass are suggested by us to be travelling over light's speed.

 

in our grand theory of everything, we said that some missing mass might get visible while still behind the visible universe and tending to replace the resided galaxies as the steady state theory said but thinking they were newly created atoms, which they arent. some of this missing mass might overtake the visible entities while still invisible and thus pulling them from without unlike what they are doing now that is pulling from within and slowing expansion. their total mass will add up roughly to the mass of the stars and nebulae that are visible and not even a black hole can stop but can slow this expansion which will continue for ever without stop and thus against the big crunch in which the theory of mass multiplication is also against.

 

Hawking theory proved that the universe will arrive at a Big Crunch, but this is believed by us to be incorrect instead we suggest that there are lesser matters in the universe but we on earth stil think there are enough due to what we call "mass mulitplication" in space. Even the inwards pulling force of the Black hole might be very small when compared to that of the Missing mass when they are the most outwards particle in the universe (that is overtaking all visible entities in the Universe due to their high speed).

Many facts show "hawking was wrong"

 

the fact is that there isnt enough matters in the universe that will make us arrive at a big crunch.

when missing mass gets newly visible ,their speed is at or few Kilometers away from light's speed and so they tend to make series of matters through the path they have travelled due to their high speed, but the actual one is usually more visible than the others but this isnt so noticed and at such we are trying to say that there are little matter in our universe and that we might have a forever expanding universe.

 

this is the theory of mass multplication

 

missing mass with their great gravity due to their great speed and mass distort space and cause it to reduce in size (contarction)as they tend to make near by galaxies appear closer towards them by bending the light around the galaxies toward their gravity according to Einstein's general theory of relativity.

 

this is the statement of the theory of space contraction

 

Cool huh?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What testable predictions does this make that other existing theories cannot make?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

missing mass don't all th time contract the universe unlike what we said previously, we sometimes think they simply make the universe seem to extend in infinity without seeming to be no matter.

 

When rays of light comes too close to the gravity of a missing mass, it will be accelerated towards its centre since they have much gravity due to their huge speed and as such the rays of light will not be seen by any one else and so it will appear as if the star doesn't exist,

but if it is not so close to the missing mass's gravity, and the gravity has not so much effect or influence on it, it will only be obsure and seem to have move away from its point.

in some cases the observer might think the star moved forward towards it (contraction seem to occur), in some cases the opposite (enlargement seem to occur).

massive bodies will only obsure light, but can absorb it only if its speed is so large enough that its mass is infinite and gravity approaches infinity and matches that of the black hole.

 

Some times galaxies might not truely be galaxies but because of the contraction (or distortion) in space, brings the two different stars close to each other and it seems like it is difficult for them to leave or expand away from each other after such a long period of time.

To understand this particular idea, read the book: "Why Galaxies might not be truely Galaxies" on http://www.lulu.com/ddnpmfng.'>http://www.lulu.com/ddnpmfng. it illustrates this portion diagramatically.

 

for more on this topic visit: http://www.lulu.com/ddnpmfng and read the books concerning space and contraction. you will know them through their description

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

missing mass don't all the time contract the universe unlike what we said previously, we sometimes think they simply make the universe seem to extend in infinity without seeming to be no matter.

 

When rays of light comes too close to the gravity of a missing mass, it will be accelerated towards its centre since they have much gravity due to their huge speed and as such the rays of light will not be seen by any one else and so it will appear as if the star doesn't exist,

but if it is not so close to the missing mass's gravity, and the gravity has not so much effect or influence on it, it will only be obsure and seem to have move away from its point.

in some cases the observer might think the star moved forward towards it (contraction seem to occur), in some cases the opposite (enlargement seem to occur).

massive bodies will only obsure light, but can absorb it only if its speed is so large enough that its mass is infinite and gravity approaches infinity and matches that of the black hole.

 

Some times galaxies might not truely be galaxies but because of the contraction (or distortion) in space, brings the two different stars close to each other and it seems like it is difficult for them to leave or expand away from each other after such a long period of time.

To understand this particular idea, read the book: "Why Galaxies might not be truely Galaxies" on http://www.lulu.com/ddnpmfng.'>http://www.lulu.com/ddnpmfng. it illustrates this portion diagramatically.

 

for more on this topic visit: http://www.lulu.com/ddnpmfng and read the books concerning space and contraction. you will know them through their description

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So, this later matter that you postulate does it interact at all? Does it emit any energy, what type of thing is it made up of (is it massive), how can it possibly be moving faster than the speed of light? If it does emit energy, why can't we detect it? Why can't we detect the matter hitting us...........

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.