Jump to content

Exponential problem


EvoN1020v

Recommended Posts

Hello guys. I was doing my math review in preparation for my Advanced Trigonometry exam, and I encountered this question with a difficulty.

 

When there were 1000 hares ([math]N_h = 1000e^{kt}[/math]), the number of foxes was increasing so that [math]N_f = 74e^{0.08t}[/math]. How many years will it take for the number of foxes to reach 10% of the number of hares?

 

I know I have to use the Natural logarithms to solve this question, but I'm not sure what I should do? If you guys can give me hints, that would be great, or I'll have to ask my teacher when I go back to school.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If the foxes' population to be 10% of the original population of hares of 1000, then the population of foxes to be 100.

 

[math]N_f = (0.1)(N_h)[/math]

[math]N_f = (0.1)(1000)[/math]

[math]N_f = 100[/math]

 

Then I put the 100 into the foxes' population forumla:

 

[math]100 = 74e^{0.08t}[/math]

 

[math]\frac{100}{74} = \frac{74e^{0.08t}}{74}[/math]

 

[math]ln1.351351351 = lne^{0.08t}[/math]

 

[math]ln1.351351351 = \frac{0.08tlne}{0.08lne}[/math]

 

[math]t = \frac{ln1.351351351}{0.08lne}[/math]

 

[math]t = 3.76381366[/math]

 

This answer to be 10% of hares' original population. If I am mistaken, please let me know. Thanks. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The k represents a constant, so treat it as one. That's my suggestion.

 

1000e^kt=740e^0.08t

 

You can solve this for "t", right? I can, and here's my hint: the answer has in the denominator the variable "k."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don´t think you should have posted the solution Matt. There´s a an error (probably a typo) in your calculation anyways, so perhaps you should consider removing it completely. It´s pretty naive to think people won´t look at solutions when they are given instead of really doing all of the calculation themselves. The question isn´t that hard, anyways and I think the confusion only stems from the free parameter you called a constant (which in fact for calculation terms might be the better way to think of it).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Judging from how you solved the problem with the 10% of the original population I´d say you are missing an important equation for logarithms: ln(x*y) = ln(x)+ln(y).

As a little style-advice: Don´t write things like ln(e), write 1 directly (or skip it if it´s a factor). It makes your calculation much more readable.

 

@MattC: I´m pretty sure it was a typo. But looking at your result you could have figured out that it couldn´t be correct. I´ll send you a PM. It doesn´t matter whether it is in preparation for an exam or homework. The point is that you don´t learn as much from seeing other people´s solutions as from solving it yourself. And I´m pretty convinced he can solve it himself - there´s not so much possibilities to take logarithms here, anyways.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm suprised there was only one typo in my solution. I would have removed it regardless, though - better to just give a hint, like you did. Ah, speaking of typos ... may want to edit that equation fast!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.