Jump to content

Help finding a bijection


bloodhound

Recommended Posts

Evidently no continuous function will do as any continuous image of a compact set is compact, and I think that is your problem with trying to figure this out.

 

Existence proof:

 

consider the maps i:[0,1] to R the inclusion and j:R to [0,1] which is the composition of the inverse tan function, which maps R bijectively with (-pi/2,pi/2) followed by adding pi/2 to map it to (0,pi) bijectively, followed by dividing by pi. j is an injection from R to [0,1] thus we have injections between the two sets and hence there exists some bijection by cantor-schroeder bernstein.

 

writing one directly.

 

notice that we can easily get a bijection between (0,1) and R using the tan trick. so we just need one from [0,1] to (0,1) and that is the standard trick:

 

map 0 to 1/3, 1/3 to 1/5, 1/5 to 1/7 etc .....

 

map 1 to 1/2, 1/2 to 1/4, 1/4 to 1/6...etc

 

leave x fixed if x has not been mentioned

 

this is a bijeciton from [0,1] to (0,1)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Evidently no continuous function will do as any continuous image of a compact set is compact' date=' and I think that is your problem with trying to figure this out.

 

Existence proof:

 

consider the maps i:[0,1'] to R the inclusion and j:R to [0,1] which is the composition of the inverse tan function, which maps R bijectively with (-pi/2,pi/2) followed by adding pi/2 to map it to (0,pi) bijectively, followed by dividing by pi. j is an injection from R to [0,1] thus we have injections between the two sets and hence there exists some bijection by cantor-schroeder bernstein.

 

writing one directly.

 

notice that we can easily get a bijection between (0,1) and R using the tan trick. so we just need one from [0,1] to (0,1) and that is the standard trick:

 

map 0 to 1/3, 1/3 to 1/5, 1/5 to 1/7 etc .....

 

map 1 to 1/2, 1/2 to 1/4, 1/4 to 1/6...etc

 

leave x fixed if x has not been mentioned

 

this is a bijeciton from [0,1] to (0,1)

 

Thanks a lot! I must warn you that I will probably swamp this board with questions on Algebra and Topological spaces in the coming days. :rolleyes:

Meanwhile, I'll go read up on the cantor schroeder bernstein theorem. I just hope it's not too complicated.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

cantor-scroeder bernstein, or whatever the correct spelling is, is an obviously true theorem, though that is different from a trivially true theorem.

 

it states that if we partially order sets by X <= Y if X injects to Y then X <=Y and Y<=X implies X=Y, which we all agree is 'obviously' true. the proof is not hard to understand but it is very clever.

 

however, it is easy to write down a bijection directly, as i did, as long as you remember the tricks and that you've got to stop thinking of 'nice' functions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.