Jump to content

The second order derivative


aommaster

Recommended Posts

Hi guys!

 

In calculus, we were shown ways of finding maximums and minimums. To do this, we had to differentiate, and then make the differential=0. Then, to make sure whether is was a maximum or minimum, we double differentiated the original equation (or simply differentiate the differential). If the value was positive, the point was a local minimum, and vice versa.

 

The book had stated that if the double differential was equal to 0, then, it was a point of inflexion. However, my teacher stated that this does not apply on some curves, and therefore, not to use it, but find the gradient before and after the point, and decide thereon.

 

Could some of you guys please give me an example of such an occurrance?

 

Thanks alot guys!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's funny becuase I started this today in maths (yr 12) and asked my teacher the same question without a satisfying response. Though I figured this:

 

[math]f(x) = x^4[/math]

 

[math]f''(x) = 12x^2[/math]

 

[math]f''(0) = 0[/math]

 

Therfore point of inflexion, oh no, razzamatazz, we know this is a minimum from experience. It is in fact a tripple root and is also a double inflexion. Not sure how to actually solve this properly without having to try above and below, though I am guessing that you have to take the quadruple derivative:

 

[math]f''''(x) = 24 > 0[/math]

 

Therfore it is a minimum.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The book had stated that if the double differential was equal to 0, then, it was a point of inflexion. However, my teacher stated that this does not apply on some curves, and therefore, not to use it, but find the gradient before and after the point, and decide thereon.

The fact that the second derivative is zero is a necessary but not a sufficient condition to have a point of inflection. A sufficient condition would be that the second derivative is 0 at the point and changes sign arround the point.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The method that I tend to use is, instead of using the double derivative, just use the single derivative for the x value before and after the point which is assumed the point of inflexion. If the sign remains constant, you know the the point is a pont of inflexion.

 

Are there any advantages of using the double derivative instead of the single derivative?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The method that I tend to use is' date=' instead of using the double derivative, just use the single derivative for the x value before and after the point which is assumed the point of inflexion. If the sign remains constant, you know the the point is a pont of inflexion.

 

Are there any advantages of using the double derivative instead of the single derivative?[/quote']

You say "the point which is assumed the point of inflexion.", but how did you find this point? With the first or second derivative being 0?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In that case you already calculated the 2nd derivative so the 'advantage' isn't that big. You are correct though, a zero second derivative and constant sign of the first derivative is a point of inflection.

The reason I asked is that some people apply your method (looking at the sign of the 1st derivative to see if it's constant) to points where the first derivative is zero. Although this gives points of inflection, it is a sufficient but not a necessary condition so you may not find all points of inflection.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.