SEPERATING SPACE FROM GRAVITY TO TRAVEL FASTER THEN LIGHT AND TRAVEL IN TIME!!!

[Brandon oldham]

SEPERATING SPACE FROM GRAVITY TO TRAVEL FASTER THEN LIGHT AND TRAVEL IN TIME!!!

        I hypothesize that space is a set size and is not expanding. The notion that it is expanding is a misunderstanding of the effect of gravity on space, time, and light. When we speak about gravity and the bending of light on the plain it is said to curve with the gravitational waves. When we are measuring photons in our calculation of the size of the universe, we leave this part out but it is a fundamental issue in determining distance that is not easily calculated.

 

 

In the drawing above you can that time, light, and objects or matter move relative to each other along the stretched path of space. If you remove gravity as in the first picture all elements including space is set at 1 light year. In the second and third gravity is introduced and stretches space, which in turn causes time, light, a matter to move along the stretched path. The more gravity the more space is stretched which means the light waves and time is stretched making it seem like the universe has a radius of 15 bil light years across, (according to nasa.gov). What if gravity passed through us or the object that we are flying in, how big would the universe be?

With out the affect of gravity on us, we would travel is a straight line allowing us to calculate that actual size of the universe. The illustration below shows what that would look like.

Furthermore, by reducing fully reducing the affect of gravity on us it would allow for us to travel faster then the speed of light, travel outside the concept of time which gives us the chance to time travel, and lastly it could explain quantum entanglement. With quantum entanglement we see electrons disappearing and reappearing between atomic layers or moving from the top of the atom to the bottom without evidence of being seen. If the electron is moving free of gravity it can be moving on a linear path but out of our normal view of light and time. So, the electron never leaves the atom or disappear and reappear they just move out of our gravitational affected view of space.

The best way to study this is in the ocean with currents. As you scale this up and make it a 3D model it would look like a fish remaining still in the ocean as the current raises, falls and moves left and right. From the fish’s perspective and anything else affected by the current there is no movement. But the ground floor of the ocean or something in the sky above sees the fish as moving. If we swapped the water for space, the fish is moving through time. Also, the amount of energy needed to travel 1000 feet is dramatically greater than in a pool with no current. Imagine riding in a boat on the ocean going over large waves vs a flat calm ocean to travel from New York to England. At the end of the trip the boat that traveled over the high waves and choppy water would have an odometer that reads 4500 miles wile the boat on the calm water would read 3400 miles. From the air and to the boat on the flat water would have the same reading and that would be moving without the effects of gravity and the boat that clocks 4500 miles. In this example we only have tides to go over and small rocking, if we were able to wrap the ocean on all sides of us and still have waves to not just sail over but also around and over/under the distance would not just be significantly greater then the 3400 miles from NY to UK while on a plane or flat body of water, it would be exponentially longer. This means that gravity must be the fourth dimension as it is the only thing that affects height, width, and depth. If we lived in a 3D world traveling a straight path would be easier

Conclusion:

The Universe is not expanding, the amount of gravity is increasing casing the light waves and matter to move across a stretched plain

Gravity is the 4 dimension and things in a 3D world (world without gravity) can move in a straight line in space.

If a ship was able to move without the forces of gravity the fabric of space would be flat, smaller, and the ship would be able to travel faster then light and outside of time. All other objects would still be affected by gravity an act accordingly.

 

Reach out if you think you could help with the math. 

Brandon O. 

bloldham32@yahoo.com

10/05/2022

[Phi for All]

!

Moderator Note

Moved from Amateur Science to Speculations.

The Speculations forum is provided for those who like to hypothesize new ideas in science. To enrich our discussions above the level of Wild Ass Guesswork (WAG) and give as much meaning as possible to such speculations, we do have some special rules to follow:

Speculations must be backed up by evidence or some sort of proof. If your speculation is untestable, or you don't give us evidence (or a prediction that is testable), your thread will be moved to the Trash Can. If you expect any scientific input, you need to provide a case that science can measure.

Be civil. As wrong as someone might be, there is no reason to insult them, and there's no reason to get angry if someone points out the flaws in your theory, either.

Keep it in the Speculations forum. Don't try to use your pet theory to answer questions in the mainstream science forums, and don't hijack other threads to advertise your new theory.

The movement of a thread into (or out of) Speculations is ultimately at the discretion of moderators, and will be determined on a case by case basis.

 

[Ghideon]

6 minutes ago, Brandon oldham said:

Reach out if you think you could help with the math. 

Is that of interest even if the mathematics shows that your idea is incorrect?

[joigus]

How do you propose to reduce the effect of gravity?

Why change a theory that already works?

Why we never see anything going faster than light?

[Brandon oldham]

@joigus I am not sure how we would negate the effect of gravity. The only thing that I can think of is to create an event horizon around the ship moving, which has been theorized before but not created yet. As far as the changing the theory that already works, I do not feel that it changes it but looks at it at a bit differently. Think of it like a graph where we are seeing space time and gravity at the zero mark on the graph but if we expand it out far enough they separate. 

According to multiple sources, including this article from Paul Sutter is an astrophysicist at The Ohio State University and the chief scientist at COSI Science Center. The universe is expanding faster than the speed of light. "So it's easy enough to compute: At some point, at some obscene distance, the speed tips over the scales and exceeds the speed of light, all from the natural, regular expansion of space.

Yes, the movement of that galaxy can be interpreted as a "speed": you can measure the distance to it, wait awhile (to be fair, a really, really long while), and measure it again. Distance moved divided by time equals speed, and I guarantee you that the speed you measure can be faster than light."

 

[Endy0816]

c (squared) is your 100%. There's no faster possible

Any distance shrinks down too the closer you get to c besides. There's nowhere left to go just by you getting near c.

[bangstrom]

For a long time it was thought the the universe contained some two billion galaxies but now the estimates may be a trillion. Anyhow, at any point in the curved 4D universe, any galaxy is surrounded by billions of galaxies so there is no escape from gravity.

The theory that the most distant galaxies are moving away faster than light is based on the assumption that space is expanding and carrying them away even faster than their recessional velocities that are approaching c.

If the universe is not expanding, then that earlier theory doesn't work.

If expansion theory is correct and the most distant galaxies are moving away faster than light, then relatively speaking, from the point of view of an observer on one of those distant galaxies, they are standing still while we are on a galaxy moving away from them faster than light so we are already there.

We can see galaxies moving faster than light because we can't see galaxies where they are today. We see the most distant galaxies where they were billions of years ago with recessional velocities they must have had at the time.

There is a story, probably not true, that Einstein asked the conductor an a train to Munich, "Relatively speaking, when does Munich arrive at this train?"

[Brandon oldham]

To your first thought,

"For a long time it was thought the the universe contained some two billion galaxies but now the estimates may be a trillion. Anyhow, at any point in the curved 4D universe, any galaxy is surrounded by billions of galaxies so there is no escape from gravity."

If you think of space as the ocean and every galaxy's gravity as a current in the ocean you would have the same affect as space and gravity. As you try to move in any direction you will be pushed or pulled due to the different currents that you can not escape. If you reach the surface or the edge of the universe you can move outside of those currents which means you can move free of gravity/currents. because you are moving free of the gravity/current it also would break the understanding that space and time are equal because you and light/ships/anything does not travel the same through the ocean vs atmosphere vs a vacuum and if you move outside the vacuum (space/universe) light will move at a different speed. That speed you are moving at could be actually faster then light moving in the vacuum and there for through time and space in the shortest distance. 

"The speed of light in water is approximately 225,000 km per second. While enormously fast, this is notably slower than the speed of light in a vacuum, which is 300,000 km per second. The degree that light slows down when passing through a medium is described by the index of refraction of that medium."

 

Instead of theorizing what is outside of the edge of space and or universe with something new, use the current theory of a multiverse. If you move from or universe to another, whether it has more or less gravity the concept can work the same, You would be moving at a different rate then our universe allowing you to travel in time. You would need less gravity to effectively move faster then the speed of light and time travel at will but if you are in a heavier gravity our universe is moving faster and pasting you by. Although you are moving in to the past or the future you would currently not have the ability to control the direction. So maybe at the distance that the galaxies appear to move faster then the speed of light, you could theorize that you are peering past the edge of our universe and into the next which would allow them to move faster then light as we see because it is not affected by our gravity as explained above. 

"If expansion theory is correct and the most distant galaxies are moving away faster than light, then relatively speaking, from the point of view of an observer on one of those distant galaxies, they are standing still while we are on a galaxy moving away from them faster than light so we are already there."