# 4th Axiom Geometric Reasoning

## Recommended Posts

4th Axiom Geometric Reasoning
I published a book about it. It is on Amazon.com
You should swing up a copy, don't you know how important logic is!?
3 Axioms have existed since ancient times.
This is a 4th axiom
This is new logic.
JOIN THE REVOLUTION!!

I have been working on new logic ideas since 2016 & finally published my first book about my idea of 4th axiom geometric reasoning!

Part 1: Triangularization

1.) Differential is consummate and has efficiency.
2.) A unit is a nexus.
3.) Congruency adds value.
4.) Contraption brings exchange.

5.) Differential has efficiency and congruency yields a unit.
6.) Units and differential can exist intersected.

7.)Then units and efficiency are also united to a cause.
8.) Then differential efficiency has congruency.
8.1) Because it is congruent to a function without needing a cause.
8.1.1) Because it has congruency.
8.1.2) And because it has efficiency to a united cause.
9.) Then all of these things are cohesive.
Part 2: Rectangularization

1.) Differential is congruent.
2.) Congruency exists.

3.) Then the differential to a unit is true.
4.) Then the differential to, unit congruency to the differential to a function exists.

5.) Congruency exists.
6.) So if differentiated, then, congruency and differential, exist and are true.

7.) Differentiated units have congruency.

8.) Then conclusion as a function exists and is true.

9.) Then these things are cohesive.

Part 3: Higher Mathematical Absolution

1.) Those discrepancies become junctions.
2.) The inherent function is a system.
3.) Together, junctions on the inherent function system, creates differential efficiency.
4.) An orbital efficiency of a higher mathematical absolution is the result.

5.) The three aspects here being, junctions from a certain discrepancy, the inherent function as a system and differential efficiency.
6.) A differential significance exists between each part and each other part of that system.
7.) This causes a system of orbital eccentricities.
8.) The result is a system of higher mathematical absolution.

Part 4: Triangular Thinking

1.) To create a third level of this pattern an additional input is required.
2.) An example of a third input would be the triangularization or rectangularization identities.
3.) The other inputs being the first two results of this pattern.
4.) Whatever the third input is, decides a new direction to this pattern of higher absolution.

5.) Complementing the third input triangularly to the pattern is the most dynamic option.
6.) Meaning that it would, mutli-dimensionally, be the mathematics version of the lowest state, dynamization.
7.) Therefore with the right additional information the complementing third input can be determined, by triangular thinking.

Part 5: Polydeltahydra

1.) After the third input is determined.
2.) Then this pattern of mathematical absolution can continue to the fourth level of sequence.
3.) To go from linear to triangular calculation, the right additional information must first be acquired.
4.) This is similar to a series of calculation stepping stones.
5.) Calculation is a system of achievable mathematical feats.
6.) Mathematics is the foundation of science.
7.) Science is applied philosophy.
8.) Literary devices have a truth value.
9.) The truth value of literary devices can be studied scientifically.
10.) Logic allows philosophy.
11.) And logic allows literature, along with creativity.
12.) Calculation allows logic.

13.) Logic is the system usually used to solve this problem
Look at my profile picture for a visual description.

url deleted

P.S. It is an axiom so I do not need to prove it! It proves itself!

!

Moderator Note

##### Share on other sites

14 hours ago, Winner568 said:

It is an axiom so I do not need to prove it! It proves itself!

I will suggest one other axiom, then:

1) The opening post of this thread is meaningless word salad

This being an axiom, no further proof or discussion will be necessary - its veracity is self-evident.

##### Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Markus Hanke said:

I will suggest one other axiom, then:

1) The opening post of this thread is meaningless word salad

This being an axiom, no further proof or discussion will be necessary - its veracity is self-evident.

Actually I think it is worse than just plain old meaningless.

It is triply redundant meaningless.

😉

## Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

## Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account