# [Math Challenge]: Prove to me that I am wrong.

## Recommended Posts

Hi all,

Why say that the following phrase is nonsense?
“The consistency of axioms cannot be proved within their own system.”

Because:
A system which has axioms for itself, in order for the system to call them axioms for itself, the system has to have a consistent behavior around those axioms and so when it behaves inconsistently with regard to those axioms, the inconsistency between those axioms and the system’s behavior the system can prove to itself.
If what is written above is false, then when a system behaves inconsistently with regard to some axioms it has for itself, that inconsistency it cannot prove to itself, and it keeps behaving inconsistently with regard to those axioms…but…
if the system keeps behaving inconsistently with regard to some axioms and cannot prove to itself that it does so with regard to those axioms, then it doesn’t seem to me it can consistently keep regarding them as axioms for the system, and then something else replaces them, and that something else is what the system calls axioms for itself.

The way humans make sense of the world around them, is either one that is funny for them, or it is one that is not funny for them.
If the way humans make sense of the world around them is not funny for them…for a long time, those people don’t have a good time…for a long time, and they may forget that…
The way one makes sense of the world around one, is funny for one, or it wouldn’t be funny for one...

check comments, you will find there, how this relates to you,just follow the money...
Edited by Phi for All
##### Share on other sites

p.s. this isn't advertising, this is a treasure hunt for you...

##### Share on other sites

3 hours ago, AlexPontik said:

!

Moderator Note

It still violates rule 2.7

3 hours ago, AlexPontik said:

this is a treasure hunt for you...

!

Moderator Note

This isn’t a treasure hunt site, it’s a discussion board.

## Create an account

Register a new account