NTuft Posted July 5, 2022 Author Share Posted July 5, 2022 (edited) 15 hours ago, studiot said: I'm sorry, I have told you something very important about Fields and you have failed to address this point each time you have replied. Instead you have introduced all sorts of irrelevant material. I have failed to understand your point. I suppose I was working with a group of quadratic surds, and then looking at fields in terms of physics. Still doubt anything I derived is correctly done. I'll leave off on further developments, and only refer to the work by Reg. Cahill for dynamical space and process physics as a better derivation alternative to GR than Suchard as a correction. That invalidates part of the premise, being that Cahill extends a flat space, but that seems like a fine way to wrap it up. Edited July 5, 2022 by NTuft *group Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!Register a new account
Already have an account? Sign in here.Sign In Now