Jump to content

Dual power in the modern world.


altaylar2000

Recommended Posts

I think most people get the wrong picture when they say that this country is doing something against that country and so on.
In fact, from about the beginning of our era, dual power was established throughout the world, power was divided into priestly and royal. These are kshatriyas and brahmanas, church and kings and the like, all this was all over the world and only the Asiatic Huns preserved the classical patriarchy.
At the same time, the power of the priesthood was apparently transnational.
The royal power has mutated into the executive, and the priestly into the legislative (which puts the right people with the help of ochlocracy). The executive branch became secondary.
Formally, there are still branches of power there, but that doesn't matter.

Therefore, to say in the categories "the country is doing something" is not correct.
There is a constant struggle, and sometimes the executive branch can gain independence and fight against legislators, a typical example of this Kennedy

 

And at the same time, the division into parties in parliament is usually a fiction, as, for example, there is almost no fundamental difference between Republicans and Democrats, it all comes down to insignificant formalities, and the general policy remains the same

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.