Jump to content

Notation study


slomobile

Recommended Posts

On 2/12/2021 at 7:58 PM, slomobile said:

Thank you for the book reference.  The topics do align with what I am studying.  I agree with most of the observations, but the places I disagree are the core of my motivation for the study.

I'm glad you liked my references.
Note there was more than one book listed. The attachments were scans from a few pages of that oft quoted standard by Wilder.
I doubt that anyone agrees with everything that was said and you should not in any case jusdge just by a few pages, they were meant to be no more than a taster.

Some more for you.

First you mentioend several times the Solvay conference. That was a long time ago.

A more modern conference (Cambridge 2006) on presaged this 21st cent book of interactions

OSAT1.jpg.bf62c7e7a07cc000ae1c2c853b441f89.jpg

 

And slightly earlier came this collection

 

 AQOP1.jpg.ff1d7ea774004d81ba3113b5d7042a06.jpg

 

 

Finally you started with a proposition that notation can cause communication difficulties.

Here is a good example from the early days of vector analysis

vectornotatat.jpg.56adf35d2b8f00f5635876bdcbb3355f.jpg

 

Keep us informed of your progress.

🙂

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.