Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
joigus

Trump's Mind Can Be Guessed in Seven Tries. Tops

Recommended Posts

The story from a non-political medium:

https://techcrunch.com/2020/10/22/dutch-hacker-trump-twitter-account-password/

If seven tries is all it took Victor Gevers to use the psychological method to crack the US president's Twitter account. How bad is that for the Western world?

Your thoughts eagerly awaited.

Edited by joigus
removed code

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, joigus said:

If seven tries is all it took Victor Gevers to use the psychological method to crack the US president's Twitter account. How bad is that for the Western world?

It's difficult to imagine how anyone, intelligent enough to want to hack his twitter account, could make it worse.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
16 minutes ago, geordief said:

jump2021?

Careful. They could hire you as digital-security expert.

1 minute ago, dimreepr said:

It's difficult to imagine how anyone, intelligent enough to want to hack his twitter account, could make it worse.

Oh, I always think things can be made worse.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, joigus said:

Oh, I always think things can be made worse.

Cometh the hour, cometh the man.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, joigus said:

How bad is that for the Western world?

While it wouldn't surprise me if true, it's important to acknowledge that the security analysts at Twitter itself are disputing this claim.

They shared in response to this story that they implemented several additional security measures and protocols from the backend last year for multiple high-profile users like Trump. They're IMO in the best position to confirm/deny these types of claims, though I do acknowledge they have a vested interest in protecting their own reputation for privacy and security... so that may play a role in their public statements.

Perhaps what's worse for our western world, however, is that it now matters so very much what might happen to billions of us and our livelihoods when one human being happens to gain access to a keyboard normally used by another one human being... a keyboard that can only share 280 characters at a time.

Seems rather fragile that so many things could so easily topple all because of such a slight change on such a tiny single thread in the broader cultural fabric.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
19 minutes ago, iNow said:

While it wouldn't surprise me if true, it's important to acknowledge that the security analysts at Twitter itself are disputing this claim.

They shared in response to this story that they implemented several additional security measures and protocols from the backend last year for multiple high-profile users like Trump. They're IMO in the best position to confirm/deny these types of claims, though I do acknowledge they have a vested interest in protecting their own reputation for privacy and security... so that may play a role in their public statements.

Perhaps what's worse for our western world, however, is that it now matters so very much what might happen to billions of us and our livelihoods when one human being happens to gain access to a keyboard normally used by another one human being... a keyboard that can only share 280 characters at a time.

Seems rather fragile that so many things could so easily topple all because of such a slight change on such a tiny single thread in the broader cultural fabric.

I'm reading more info about it and I also made a mistake. It was 5 times. I've read it was 7 somewhere else.

But Ian Plunkett's --Twitter's spokeperson-- words are:

Quote

We proactively implemented account security measures for a designated group of high-profile, election-related Twitter accounts in the United States, including federal branches of government.

When someone "proactively implements" something my BS alarms go off. And the adverb "proactively" would really make it worse, not better, if it did happen.

OTOH, these claims seem hard to just make up. The guy took screenshots. Are they fake? Why no explanation about the screenshots?

And it's true that Trump's Twitter account is small potatoes, but this guy has access to top-security material, I suppose. Can't anyone give him a quick tutorial on safety security procedures?

I know you've proactively considered these possibilities, @iNow.

Edited by joigus

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

When someone "proactively considers" something my BS alarms go off ;)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 hours ago, joigus said:

If seven five tries is all it took Victor Gevers to use [...]

 

3 hours ago, iNow said:

When someone "proactively considers" something my BS alarms go off ;)

Then I can trust you.

Some people even proactively overreact.

I always consider things reactively or retroactively. :doh:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.