molbol2000 Posted October 18, 2020 Share Posted October 18, 2020 Almost all modern science is speculative and not based on empirical evidence, even "classical mechanic" It's like symbol of faith, that canonized and becomes acsiomatics for sciense, "postulats", "laws", "blablabla". Looks like something "serious". For mass -5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ghideon Posted October 18, 2020 Share Posted October 18, 2020 23 minutes ago, molbol2000 said: Almost all modern science is speculative and not based on empirical evidence, even "classical mechanic" That is an example of a logical fallacy. I think it can be placed into the category of Informal fallacies, Fallacies of presumption. It can probably also fit Shifting of the burden of proof (onus probandi) Someone with more skills in logic may be able to fill in. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
molbol2000 Posted October 18, 2020 Author Share Posted October 18, 2020 5 minutes ago, Ghideon said: That is an example of a logical fallacy. I think it can be placed into the category of Informal fallacies, Fallacies of presumption. It can probably also fit Shifting of the burden of proof (onus probandi) Someone with more skills in logic may be able to fill in. Everything is simpler: in *real* science there are no unproven statements, the whole basis is derived from experience and is its generalization It's the principles that was before the middle of XX century, at least as an ideal of at least natural science The very time when science really bore fruit, and not just regular publications of fairy tales about black holes -2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
swansont Posted October 18, 2020 Share Posted October 18, 2020 4 hours ago, molbol2000 said: Almost all modern science is speculative and not based on empirical evidence, even "classical mechanic" It's like symbol of faith, that canonized and becomes acsiomatics for sciense, "postulats", "laws", "blablabla". Looks like something "serious". For mass ! Moderator Note This is a listed example of a bad-faith argument in our rules. Quote Everything is simpler: in *real* science there are no unproven statements, the whole basis is derived from experience and is its generalization ! Moderator Note Spectacularly wrong. One might think you are trolling. In any event, hijacking threads to bash science without supporting arguments violates multiple rules 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts