Jump to content

Worldwide waste generation


Recommended Posts

So the world's number one waste product - about 5 times more than all other waste combined but a gas not a solid, ie CO2 - is not included? It does get it's own studies, lots of them but the enormous scale of that waste stream does leap out when you list it together with the rest.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know what you mean, and the liberation/generation of CO2 is a concern for the vast majority of people.

That being said, CO2 is not waste.
It is essential for life on the planet, and part of a 'cycle'.
( its constituents are the basis for all life on the planet )
Certainly not the definition of waste

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, MigL said:

That being said, CO2 is not waste.
It is essential for life on the planet, and part of a 'cycle'.
( its constituents are the basis for all life on the planet )
Certainly not the definition of waste

I disagree; the products of combustion of fuels are waste, just as food scraps and sewage solids are - which are also (potential) nutrients for other living things. They are especially problematic waste products when the flows of them exceed the capacity of natural as well as technical cycles to recycle and re-use them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, MigL said:

I know what you mean, and the liberation/generation of CO2 is a concern for the vast majority of people.

That being said, CO2 is not waste.
It is essential for life on the planet, and part of a 'cycle'.
( its constituents are the basis for all life on the planet )
Certainly not the definition of waste

+1

Well considered.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, MigL said:

That being said, CO2 is not waste.
It is essential for life on the planet, and part of a 'cycle'.
( its constituents are the basis for all life on the planet )
Certainly not the definition of waste

But, as with many things, more is not necessarily better. You would die if you tried to breath pure oxygen for an extended period.

Some plants might do a little better with slightly raised CO2 levels, others not so much. Levels of CO2 only slightly higher than we have now will start to reduce rice production, for example, which is obviously a staple food for large parts of the world.

There are many things which are essential for life but may be produced as waste from industrial processes. Polluting the environment with excessive excessive amounts of water, salt, fertiliser, CO2 or many other things would generally be a bad thing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yep, waste and pollutant is not the same. Waste is defined from manufacturing point of view, while pollutant is defined from ecological point of view. (Although even 'pollutant'  does not seem as a good word - it has a broader meaning - maybe 'poison' wold do better?)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Global waste production will continue to increase by 70% if no actions are taken (World Bank's report). In 2050, waste generation will increase to 3.40 billion!! They evaluates that between 33% and 40% of the waste is not manage properly. They are rather dumped or burned.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.