dad Posted February 19, 2020 Share Posted February 19, 2020 On 5/22/2019 at 1:50 PM, beecee said: Here is a recent article on that matter........ https://solarsystem.nasa.gov/news/863/nasa-study-reproduces-origins-of-life-on-ocean-floor/ NASA Study Reproduces Origins of Life on Ocean Floor: Scientists have reproduced in the lab how the ingredients for life could have formed deep in the ocean 4 billion years ago. The results of the new study offer clues to how life started on Earth and where else in the cosmos we might find it. A time-lapse video of a miniature hydrothermal chimney forming in the lab, as it would in early Earth's ocean. Natural vents can continue to form for thousands of years and grow to tens of yards (meters) in height. Credit: NASA/JPL-Caltech/Flores Astrobiologist Laurie Barge and her team at NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory in Pasadena, California, are working to recognize life on other planets by studying the origins of life here on Earth. Their research focuses on how the building blocks of life form in hydrothermal vents on the ocean floor. To re-create hydrothermal vents in the lab, the team made their own miniature seafloors by filling beakers with mixtures that mimic Earth's primordial ocean. These lab-based oceans act as nurseries for amino acids, organic compounds that are essential for life as we know it. Like Lego blocks, amino acids build on one another to form proteins, which make up all living things. more at link..... Big news: Scientists place several pieces off spaghetti on table and envision how the spaghetti monster may have formed billions of imaginary years ago. Wow. On 5/22/2019 at 11:24 AM, Moontanman said: The evidence is in the fossil record and the genetic record. No it is not. Your beliefs imposed and foisted onto the record are all that you considered evidence. The fossil record is not known to have been laid down in the present nature. Nor are genes today known to have existed the same in the past. On 6/20/2019 at 3:54 AM, Polinski said: How come a peterbilt 18 wheel semi has cylinders just like a smart car. Are they decended from a common ancestor or did their creators just use the most logical best working parts. Face it mammals are machines just like cars, only they were designed to reproduce and better themselves without further help from the builder. There is zero possibility of hundreds of thousands of dna lines happening in the mud randomely to form the simplest protozoan Why do people believe in mathematical impossibility Because they have chosen lies. On 6/19/2019 at 8:41 PM, Moontanman said: Neither but both do at some point have a common ancestor, probably back in the triassic or jurassic False. -1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moontanman Posted February 19, 2020 Share Posted February 19, 2020 1 hour ago, dad said: Big news: Scientists place several pieces off spaghetti on table and envision how the spaghetti monster may have formed billions of imaginary years ago. Wow. WOW! 1 hour ago, dad said: No it is not. Citation please! 1 hour ago, dad said: Your beliefs imposed and foisted onto the record are all that you considered evidence. Project much? 1 hour ago, dad said: The fossil record is not known to have been laid down in the present nature. I'm not sure what you mean, your sentence makes no sense... 1 hour ago, dad said: Nor are genes today known to have existed the same in the past. Who says they did? 1 hour ago, dad said: Because they have chosen lies. Prove it... 1 hour ago, dad said: False. Prove it... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
beecee Posted February 19, 2020 Share Posted February 19, 2020 1 hour ago, dad said: Big news: Scientists place several pieces off spaghetti on table and envision how the spaghetti monster may have formed billions of imaginary years ago. Wow. No it is not. Your beliefs imposed and foisted onto the record are all that you considered evidence. The fossil record is not known to have been laid down in the present nature. Nor are genes today known to have existed the same in the past. The usual unsupported rhetoric. When will you support what you claim? The theory of evolution is fact. There is no doubt in that regard https://www.nas.edu/evolution/TheoryOrFact.html Is Evolution a Theory or a Fact? It is both. But that answer requires looking more deeply at the meanings of the words "theory" and "fact." In everyday usage, "theory" often refers to a hunch or a speculation. When people say, "I have a theory about why that happened," they are often drawing a conclusion based on fragmentary or inconclusive evidence. "The formal scientific definition of theory is quite different from the everyday meaning of the word. It refers to a comprehensive explanation of some aspect of nature that is supported by a vast body of evidence. Many scientific theories are so well-established that no new evidence is likely to alter them substantially. For example, no new evidence will demonstrate that the Earth does not orbit around the sun (heliocentric theory), or that living things are not made of cells (cell theory), that matter is not composed of atoms, or that the surface of the Earth is not divided into solid plates that have moved over geological timescales (the theory of plate tectonics). Like these other foundational scientific theories, the theory of evolution is supported by so many observations and confirming experiments that scientists are confident that the basic components of the theory will not be overturned by new evidence. However, like all scientific theories, the theory of evolution is subject to continuing refinement as new areas of science emerge or as new technologies enable observations and experiments that were not possible previously" more at link.... . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dad Posted February 19, 2020 Author Share Posted February 19, 2020 (edited) 1 hour ago, Moontanman said: WOW! Citation please! Project much? I'm not sure what you mean, your sentence makes no sense... Who says they did? Prove it... Prove it... Since you say nothing your post, what can I say? The idea that nature was the same on earth in the past is not a fact or real knowledge or science. It is a belief. I suspect that in the former nature (different according to history and scripture records) evolving occurred to living animals and man. I suspect that most animals on the planet and mankind could not leave remains, therefore no fossilized remains. That means that stringing together what life existed using the fossil record is a joke. It also means genetica vcannot trace back to the former world and time. That means you have nothing but religion pal. 1 hour ago, beecee said: Quote The usual unsupported rhetoric. When will you support what you claim? My claim is that we do not know what nature was like (laws and forces) on earth in the far past. That is supported by your fail to be able to support a claim it was the same. I win. Quote The theory of evolution is fact. There is no doubt in that regard Not true. TOE is a foolish fable based on beliefs and ignorance and misinterpreting the fossil and genetic records etc. Quote Many scientific theories are so well-established that no new evidence is likely to alter them substantially Don't try and ride the coattails of actual science or knowledge. The theory of evolution is neither. Yes evolving did and does happen. No, we do not share ancestors with flatworms. Quote . For example, no new evidence will demonstrate that the Earth does not orbit around the sun (heliocentric theory), This is news? Quote or that living things are not made of cells (cell theory), That does not help your fable. Edited February 19, 2020 by dad -2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hypervalent_iodine Posted February 19, 2020 Share Posted February 19, 2020 ! Moderator Note Quit hijacking threads with your unsubstantiated and unscientific rhetoric. You were warned about this barely 3 hours ago, and you will be banned if you continue. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts