Tor Fredrik Posted January 4, 2020 Share Posted January 4, 2020 (edited) First I will add some theory Then I will try to derive rydberg energy formula from a kinetic perspective The numbers above is correct for the rydberg formula. Is it possible to derive plancks constant, bohr radius or velocity for electron in n=1 for hydrogen atom with this? This is how far I get equating centripetal force and coulomb attraction: Edited January 4, 2020 by Tor Fredrik had to do recalculations Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tor Fredrik Posted January 5, 2020 Author Share Posted January 5, 2020 (edited) But why is n only integers? Edited January 5, 2020 by Tor Fredrik Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
swansont Posted January 5, 2020 Share Posted January 5, 2020 Bohr’s formulation does not have a magnetic field Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tor Fredrik Posted January 5, 2020 Author Share Posted January 5, 2020 Just now, swansont said: Bohr’s formulation does not have a magnetic field Theres no B field in the derivation? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
swansont Posted January 5, 2020 Share Posted January 5, 2020 No. It assumes a circular orbit stemming from a Coulomb force. Why would there be a magnetic field? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now