Ken Fabian Posted July 16, 2019 Share Posted July 16, 2019 Farid, are you trying to be a topologist? Anyway it is your premise that the circle gets changed into a square - and that means (and therefore proves) the circle undergoes change. It is you that keeps telling us it is changed - should I be apologising for believing you? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Farid Posted July 16, 2019 Author Share Posted July 16, 2019 (edited) Quote No, that person is saying the circle transformed into a square, not that the circle it is equivalent to a square. I know that person is saying it transformed. If someone says that a circle became a square, he is saying that a circle is a square or a circle is the same as a square. So you are saying that a circle cannot be a square or a circle is not the same as a square, therefore a circle always remains a circle. Quote Anyway it is your premise that the circle gets changed into a square - and that means (and therefore proves) the circle undergoes change. It is you that keeps telling us it is changed - should I be apologising for believing you? Try to ignore that change is happening. Try just focusing on understanding what I am saying. I was not saying that a change is happening, I was saying suppose someone else does. Edited July 16, 2019 by Farid -2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
swansont Posted July 16, 2019 Share Posted July 16, 2019 ! Moderator Note Since this just seems to be arguing semantics, going in circles, and is indistinguishable from trolling: closed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts