thethinkertank

The Golden Ratio and my face: Superior genetics?

Am I likely to have superior genetics based on Phi the golden ratio's abundance in my facial structure?  

3 members have voted

  1. 1. Please answer yes no or maybe



Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

If you look at my face (here it is)

you will notice the near perfect symmetery in my features, which surely have a evolutionary advantage to it. They fit the famous 'golden ratio' theory that states that the more symmeteric one's face is, the more superior one is as a human being in some ways.

Heres the theory

https://interestingengineering.com/phi-and-the-mathematics-of-beauty

What say? Am I superior, if only in symmetery?

P.S if you do a reverse image search on that photo google actually identifies me as 'human' which supposing you view google search as a bio technological process, (half human half robot like a android) you will be pleased to see the verdict of a unbiased android resonates with me being a typical Human. Which I find most invigourating! Besides the law of the survival of the fittest contends that the most average blokes are the ones who are the most likely to evolve.

33333333.png

Edited by thethinkertank

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)

Is it even possible to be any more vain. This is SFN not Vouge.

Edited by Curious layman

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, John Cuthber said:

lol possible proof google search that bioltechnological android has more than one way of showing results, meaning it possibly evolved into a opinionated android over time. 

Just now, Curious layman said:

Is it even possible to be any more vain. This is SFN not Vouge you know.

There is no element of vanity in my post. Pure scientific questions and discussion. After all beauty is rooted in science as the link shows. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If you have the same attitude in real life outside of internet forums, you will need to find replacements for your genetically superior teeth pretty soon. People don’t like a**holes, stop being one. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
24 minutes ago, thethinkertank said:

What say? Am I superior, if only in symmetery?

I'll wait till you hit puberty before I answer.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, koti said:

If you have the same attitude in real life outside of internet forums, you will need to find replacements for your genetically superior teeth pretty soon. People don’t like a**holes, stop being one. 

no no, outside internet forums I am a very different human being. Wouldnt like to lack in said teeth as superior ones are difficult to find replacements for, and these are original 24 carat teeth. (Good for carrots lol...carat...carrot..get it? pun haha)

Just now, dimreepr said:

I'll wait till you hit puberty before I answer.

Im a post-pubescent specimen as of the time of writing of this post. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, thethinkertank said:

Im a post-pubescent specimen as of the time of writing of this post.

The evidence suggests otherwise.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, dimreepr said:

The evidence suggests otherwise.

Your percieved notion of the evidence, in fact. Which may or may not be what the book suggests as veracity.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
32 minutes ago, thethinkertank said:

They fit the famous 'golden ratio' theory that states that the more symmeteric one's face is, the more superior one is as a human being in some ways.

Heres the theory

https://interestingengineering.com/phi-and-the-mathematics-of-beauty

What say? Am I superior, if only in symmetery?

I think it fits to a personality disorder. My first guess is narcissist  personality disorder, maybe schizotypal.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Eise said:

I think it fits to a personality disorder. My first guess is narcissist  personality disorder, maybe schizotypal.

! This comment has been moved to speculations for want of backing. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, thethinkertank said:

! This comment has been moved to speculations for want of backing. 

I'd back it as I suspect will the majority here.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, thethinkertank said:

! This comment has been moved to speculations for want of backing. 

Or better yet the Trash Can.

How is this not Dunning–Kruger spam?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites