Phantom5 Posted March 31, 2019 Share Posted March 31, 2019 And what will it be? The answer is nothing. Here to the explanation ... A saying of mine was that if gravity is an "element" that consists of all the elements, then it must be something that is made of everything. For the most part, atoms are nothing. For the most part, the universe is nothing. So empty vacuum. This may not suit some because of the dark matter but here is another explanation ... Everything that is in motion can only be put into that state by turning. Joints, motors, wheels, turbines, planets, suns, galaxies, pumps, as well as the lungs and heart have a few degrees of rotation in the walls. Well gravitation is also a force that moves things, such as Without them we would not have a day or a night. Calculated back, so must the crucial clue how gravity works by turning happen. There is again only one answer. Nothing. What do we have when everything moves outward in the middle? Nothing. However, that would stop at a certain point, because nothing in the middle keeps everything from moving further out. Physically, this is called a vacuum. In a centrifuge there would also be a vacuum in the middle. Well CERN did not look for anything, only nothing. If you want to know more, check out the example of a diagram by Edmond Halley on Wikipedia, but that goes into the field of conspiracy theory. You can also align atoms by vacuum which you can test with 300-400 €. Video from the experiment is the same and no it is not the moving sheet, which I have tested ..... And what if not everything turns? We would not be there, everything would disappear in all directions. Here is the video ... What I still consider speculative, what I wrote in a previous article with the perfect reactor, is that every atom has its own frequency. What would be possible to produce gold magnets, waiting for the explanation. So predominantly by the, let's call force field and not magnetic field, the earth iron aligned, I would bet on it has to do with the Schumann Resonanz. Speculatively, one would have to be able to magnetize gold by a normal vacuum which only sucks particles so that it also attracts gold. I suspect that I have not thought 100% that you have to generate a different frequency field in the vicinity of the tube and the glued on there gold sheet so that the gold atoms can be aligned. That would have to go with any other material as long as you know the frequency. With lead, it would be conceivable to generate a magnetic field which shields gamma radiation. If you can atomise the atoms for alignment and thus also for the generation of a lead magnetic field. There are many other things possible. Oh PS a black hole is then a vacuum which not only absorbs particle but also radiation. For this I already have a solution, as everyone knows, power always goes the shortest way and around a current-carrying conductor rotates a magnetic field. What if you take a tube and connect it from all sides, at both ends with cables that are all exactly the same length and all need exactly the same way for the current? Then a magnetic field would have to rotate around the tube and, in the interior, create a suction for radiation, assuming corresponding energies. By the way, you would have a time machine. Welcome to Star Trek. Particles vacuum nice and good but does anyone speak of a blasting vacuum? -1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ghideon Posted March 31, 2019 Share Posted March 31, 2019 14 minutes ago, Phantom5 said: Welcome to Star Trek. Welcome to speculations, where one may also boldly go where no man has gone before. But please provide some kind of model and math describing what you want to discuss. My version of the universal translator seems incapable of translating the post to Federation Standard English. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
koti Posted March 31, 2019 Share Posted March 31, 2019 28 minutes ago, Phantom5 said: ...The answer is nothing... ...There is again only one answer. Nothing.... ...Nothing... ...only nothing... You got one part right, you got absolutely nothing, no model - nothing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phantom5 Posted March 31, 2019 Author Share Posted March 31, 2019 6 minutes ago, Ghideon said: Welcome to speculations, where one may also boldly go where no man has gone before. But please provide some kind of model and math describing what you want to discuss. My version of the universal translator seems incapable of translating the post to Federation Standard English. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schumann_resonances Here are one of the missing links and i have translated it from german to english because that was the easiest way for me and i understand it so too. When you have questions ask me, maybe the problem is that i dont have set enough comma. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
koti Posted March 31, 2019 Share Posted March 31, 2019 2 minutes ago, Phantom5 said: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schumann_resonances Here are one of the missing links and i have translated it from german to english because that was the easiest way for me and i understand it so too. When you have questions ask me, maybe the problem is that i dont have set enough comma. No thats not it. The universal translator seems to be not working properly here on my side as well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phantom5 Posted March 31, 2019 Author Share Posted March 31, 2019 3 minutes ago, koti said: You got one part right, you got absolutely nothing, no model - nothing. I have realy a question do you joking me? Its absoluetly easy to understand and every good article that i have wrote was closed. It comes mote tomrs for me like a conspuracy about good and correct science. It gives so much bullshit articles and my was everytine closed and much from the team says everytime that all was wrong. I have worked 13 years for the anwser and you destroy it me with a wrong anwser, that looks like a conspiracy about correct physics and science. 1 minute ago, koti said: No thats not it. The universal translator seems to be not working properly here on my side as well. Im sorry but what language are you speaking i can translate it with my own words but it was easier for me with the google translator and i understand it too in the translated english. Sorry but english is the main language of the world. -1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
koti Posted March 31, 2019 Share Posted March 31, 2019 2 minutes ago, Phantom5 said: I have realy a question do you joking me? Its absoluetly easy to understand and every good article that i have wrote was closed. It comes mote tomrs for me like a conspuracy about good and correct science. It gives so much bullshit articles and my was everytine closed and much from the team says everytime that all was wrong. I have worked 13 years for the anwser and you destroy it me with a wrong anwser, that looks like a conspiracy about correct physics and science. Where is the physics? Show us something because so far you have shown NOTHING. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phi for All Posted March 31, 2019 Share Posted March 31, 2019 40 minutes ago, Phantom5 said: A saying of mine was that if gravity is an "element" that consists of all the elements, then it must be something that is made of everything. Nobody, NOBODY else says that gravity is an element. You can't base an idea on something that starts WRONG, and then hope to rationally work to a reasonable conclusion. Does that make sense? 43 minutes ago, Phantom5 said: For the most part, atoms are nothing. For the most part, the universe is nothing. So empty vacuum. More bad reasoning. You start with "for the most part" and then end with "empty vacuum". Most doesn't equal all. The rest of your post reads the same way, with poor reasoning leading to bad conclusions. This is why your threads get closed. You don't follow any decent methodology. 47 minutes ago, Phantom5 said: Everything that is in motion can only be put into that state by turning. How was an asteroid "turned"? What about the movement of air we call wind? Does turning fire a cannonball? Another wrong assumption. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Strange Posted March 31, 2019 Share Posted March 31, 2019 45 minutes ago, Phantom5 said: A saying of mine was that if gravity is an "element" that consists of all the elements, then it must be something that is made of everything. You should probably choose a saying that makes sense. 46 minutes ago, Phantom5 said: Everything that is in motion can only be put into that state by turning. Nonsense. Put two non-rotating, relatively stationary objects in empty space and they fall directly towards one another with no turning. 48 minutes ago, Phantom5 said: Calculated back, so must the crucial clue how gravity works by turning happen. There is again only one answer. Nothing. What do we have when everything moves outward in the middle? Nothing. However, that would stop at a certain point, because nothing in the middle keeps everything from moving further out. This is just gibberish. 48 minutes ago, Phantom5 said: Well CERN did not look for anything, only nothing. No. They look at the particles produced by colliding protons. That is not nothing. 49 minutes ago, Phantom5 said: And what if not everything turns? We would not be there, everything would disappear in all directions. Gravity has nothing to do with rotation. Neither do the electromagnetic interactions holding molecules together. 50 minutes ago, Phantom5 said: every atom has its own frequency. Every atom has multiple frequencies corresponding to different excitation levels of the electrons and even of the nucleus. 52 minutes ago, Phantom5 said: I would bet on it has to do with the Schumann Resonanz You would lose. 52 minutes ago, Phantom5 said: I suspect that I have not thought 100% I would say your though and understanding is pretty close to 0%. You really should learn some basic physics instead of posting all this drivel. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phi for All Posted March 31, 2019 Share Posted March 31, 2019 18 minutes ago, Phantom5 said: I have worked 13 years for the anwser and you destroy it me with a wrong anwser, that looks like a conspiracy about correct physics and science. Why did you reject mainstream science? You could have had a first class science education in less than half that time, and it would have given you all the basics you'd need understand the things you think are wrong, PLUS you'd have the kind of advanced training that would truly let you approach science at the level you think you are now. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phantom5 Posted March 31, 2019 Author Share Posted March 31, 2019 (edited) 17 minutes ago, Phi for All said: Why did you reject mainstream science? You could have had a first class science education in less than half that time, and it would have given you all the basics you'd need understand the things you think are wrong, PLUS you'd have the kind of advanced training that would truly let you approach science at the level you think you are now. My physic model was closed and dont ends in infininity things but when that was your job calculate infinity, what is the force behind the graviton and then what is the force behind the next particle and next and next and next, the mount everest dont goes to the end of space and further. And i have the correct answer for the gravity and much other things. Maybe i say only x files, agent mulder and agent scully, i feel it that i have to do with these life forms, i want be a manipulated species but this is my home and my planet. And it gives bigger forces then you lovely reticulans. And when you erase me yet, i make it bigger and farer. Edited March 31, 2019 by Phantom5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Strange Posted March 31, 2019 Share Posted March 31, 2019 1 minute ago, Phantom5 said: My physic model was closed You don't have a model. You just make up nonsense. 2 minutes ago, Phantom5 said: And i have the correct answer for the gravity and much other things. Of course you don't. You are just deluding yourself. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phi for All Posted March 31, 2019 Share Posted March 31, 2019 1 minute ago, Phantom5 said: My physic model was closed and dont ends in infininity things but when that was your job calculate infinity, what is the force behind the graviton and then what is the force behind the next particle and next and next and next, the mount everest dont goes to the end of space and further. And i have the correct answer for the gravity and much other things. Maybe i say only x files, agent mulder and agent scully, i feel it that i have to do with these life forms, i want be a manipulated species but this is my home and my planet. And it gives bigger forces then you lovely reticulans. And when you erase me yet, i make it bigger and farer. Dude, you make NO SENSE at all. You quoted what I wrote, but didn't respond to any of my questions. You need to work on your discussion skills, as well as your science skills. It doesn't help that you make claims instead of ask questions about things you don't understand. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phantom5 Posted March 31, 2019 Author Share Posted March 31, 2019 One thing i said, i here voices in my head and yet i here the fucking reticulans want to destroy the hole planet only for one person. The reticulans are not so great as they seem. Hold me yet for what ever, i think thats maybe the last post from me -1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
koti Posted March 31, 2019 Share Posted March 31, 2019 Man, don’t you just love the internet on a Sunday evening. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
swansont Posted March 31, 2019 Share Posted March 31, 2019 1 hour ago, Phantom5 said: My physic model was closed ! Moderator Note You were asked to review the rules for posting in speculations. It seems you have not done so, since you have not provided us with a model, testable predictions and/or evidence. In addition, we have a rule about not posting to advertise your blog, or YouTube channel 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts