MaximT Posted December 31, 2018 Share Posted December 31, 2018 This device, that is not complete on the video, aim the production of ether wave. Produced by the oscillation of an electric field, the Helium-3 atom, isotope of the natural Helium, will be victim of it's own inertia and will emit an beam of anti-particles. L ∂²i/∂²t + R ∂i/∂t + 1/C i = ω * A cos ( ω * t) Q = ∫ i * ∂t σ = Q / surface E = σ / (2 * є) ; є = 1 (air) F = E * q ; q = 1.6 E-19 C F = m * а ; m = 1.6 E-27 kg t = ½ * 1 / f s = ∫∫ а * ∂t = ½ * а * t² ½ * kernel of He-3 < s < kernel of He-3 This is the complete device, with it's strange oscillators I didn't have enough time to draw them correctly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Strange Posted December 31, 2018 Share Posted December 31, 2018 ! Moderator Note The rules require you to explain what is in the video. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MaximT Posted December 31, 2018 Author Share Posted December 31, 2018 First, there is C-60: Buckminsterfullerene This is a Buckminsterfullerene, some He-3 atoms could be put inside in couple of days for a period of 340 hours, because when it's loosing He atmosphere it's decompose, but enough time to put them in a glue that will solidify and keep them for a much longer time... This process has a lot of advantages: inert substances easy to dissolve in toluene toluene will dissolve the glue too toluene will slowly evaporate to fixed the whole thing Almost great re-partition of the final Helium-3 On a very thin layer Second, there is inside those C-60 molecules, one atom of He-3, the isotope of natural Helium. Third, there are some ether wave, that came out the device: By the assumption that the operation on the Helium, don't open a infinite energetic channel, to the target, the flux of 4 states matter should be related to the number of oscillation created by the Oscillo-Suzane-1. With a density layer of Ω atom/m³ for the He-3, a surface of Ж m², a thickness of ∏ m, and a frequency of ₼ Hertz, we could achieved theoretical emission flux ∑ of 4 states matter unit/(m²*s). ∑ = ₼ * Ω / ∏ * Ж where Ω = 1100 units / Proposed thickness of 100 E-6 m * Proposed Area of 1 E-3 m² When those He-3 atoms will be fixed in the cement, whatever inside the C60 or having escape it, they will be ionic partners free, and we will be able to make them oscillate, and fortunately with the help of inertia, produce some 4 states matter. But unfortunately, the theoretical “LASER”, for the electron, won't be achieved, there is going to be some deviation of the beam, related to the ratio of orbital energy and electric field that we must apply With a ratio of 1750X between the electrons and the neutron/proton, in the magnitude of the electric field, we certainly could achieve, almost only electronic ether beam. All that came from the ether theory, older than Einstein at Maxwell time, extract from Maxwell book, tome II: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MaximT Posted April 13, 2019 Author Share Posted April 13, 2019 This theoretical image show how to create matter, with this concept of Aether. The Aether theory is not death yet:Louis de Broglie stated, "Any particle, ever isolated, has to be imagined as in continuous "energetic contact" with a hidden medium." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
swansont Posted April 13, 2019 Share Posted April 13, 2019 10 hours ago, MaximT said: The Aether theory is not death yet:Louis de Broglie stated, "Any particle, ever isolated, has to be imagined as in continuous "energetic contact" with a hidden medium." Is it your contention that no physics has been done in the last 80-90 years to render this quotation moot? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Cuthber Posted April 14, 2019 Share Posted April 14, 2019 On 4/13/2019 at 6:49 AM, MaximT said: The Aether theory is not death yet: It never was "death", but it is dead; and it has been since the Michelson Morley experiment about 130 years ago. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MaximT Posted January 16, 2020 Author Share Posted January 16, 2020 I'm still alive, if someone want to argue :) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ghideon Posted January 16, 2020 Share Posted January 16, 2020 (edited) On 12/31/2018 at 1:20 PM, MaximT said: All that came from the ether theory, older than Einstein at Maxwell time, extract from Maxwell book, tome II: Yes the theory is older than Einstein. The theory was tested and did not match experiments and observations. That should be a strong hint that the theory is not a very useful start for building a device. Since we know that the theory is incorrect we also know that the device will not work. 1 hour ago, MaximT said: I'm still alive, if someone want to argue Since aether is dead, what's next? Phlogiston based fire extinguishers? Edited January 16, 2020 by Ghideon missing line Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MaximT Posted January 16, 2020 Author Share Posted January 16, 2020 40 minutes ago, Ghideon said: The theory was tested and did not match experiments and observations. And if the Aether is fixed around the Sun, the experiment was in agreement the medium theory... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Strange Posted January 16, 2020 Share Posted January 16, 2020 2 minutes ago, MaximT said: And if the Aether is fixed around the Sun, the experiment was in agreement the medium theory... ! Moderator Note Provide citations and data to back up this assertion in the next post or this thread will be closed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MaximT Posted January 16, 2020 Author Share Posted January 16, 2020 It's the best I can do, It's unknown theory: If you let me continue, I will implement better and better over time... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Strange Posted January 16, 2020 Share Posted January 16, 2020 3 minutes ago, MaximT said: It's the best I can do ! Moderator Note If a meaningless diagram with no explanation is the best you can do, then I think we are done here. Do not start another thread on this. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts