Space cuvature is absolutly impossible

[Phantom5]

In the model with the ball and the net, is the function correct, but the universe isnt a net and not two dimensional.

And under the net must be gravity and the physicians want to explain the gravity with a net and a ball.

Should be under the net another net? 

And under the net from the net still another net too?

Then i can told the world is a disk and stands on infinetly turtles. 

The only posibility is that the gravity is three dimensional like a magnetic field, nothing other.

Or should the room see like calabi yau?

 

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Calabi–Yau_manifold

 

That is wrong too.

 

[swansont]

48 minutes ago, Phantom5 said:

In the model with the ball and the net

What model is this?

And how is that related to the title of this thread?

[Strange]

47 minutes ago, Phantom5 said:

In the model with the ball and the net, is the function correct, but the universe isnt a net and not two dimensional.

And under the net must be gravity and the physicians want to explain the gravity with a net and a ball.

It is just an analogy to aid understanding 

50 minutes ago, Phantom5 said:

The only posibility is that the gravity is three dimensional like a magnetic field, nothing other.

It is four dimensional.