Jump to content

Evolutionary Failure of Atheism


Recommended Posts

Richard Dawkins explains "the purpose of life is spreading copy me programs."

 

Oops!  Richard Dawkins, Stephen Hawking, Carl Sagan, Sam Harris, Christopher Hitchens, Michael Schermer, Daniel Dennett, and Bill Nye The Science Guy together have fewer children than Osama Bin Laden.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, StarMan said:

Oops!  Richard Dawkins, Stephen Hawking, Carl Sagan, Sam Harris, Christopher Hitchens, Michael Schermer, Daniel Dennett, and Bill Nye The Science Guy together have fewer children than Osama Bin Laden.

Quality versus quantity..
microorganisms, and very simple animals, can have multimillion of eggs and children.

The more advanced living organism, the less chance to lose children, the less children they have, and instead they put more attention to their development.

Marie Curie, had two, one of them received Nobel Prize as well.. Grandchild was also quantum physicists..

One can have sex every day, with different women, and have almost as many children as days of life, and then pay no attention to their growing up, development, and teach nothing.. Unless you will use website (like this one), which can be read by the all your children, at the same time, if they're interested.. ;)

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Sensei said:

Quality versus quantity..
microorganisms, and very simple animals, can have multimillion of eggs and children.

 

 

What does Darwinism care about quality, in the sense you intend?  There are Pakistani families who breed within their own families, producing severely retarded children who go on to continue the practice.  Muslims intend to take over the world and are far outpacing atheists/agnostics in this regard.  IF atheism is so very rational, so very scientific and good and true, then why do its adherents abandon atheism more than Catholics or Baptists or Lutherans or Mormons or Muslims do?

(See graph below)

Then there is your comment:  

One can have sex every day, with different women, and have almost as many children as days of life, and then pay no attention to their growing up, development, and teach nothing..

 

It reminds me of Isaac Asimov, who so neglected his own son that his son became a pedophile, arrested a few years ago in California with thousands of illegal child porn images on his computer.  Lovely legacy for the consummately arrogant, hateful Isaac Asimov, who was so ignorant that he never flew on commercial aircraft, out of fear.

atheist retention rate 30%.jpg

Edited by StarMan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, StarMan said:

What does Darwinism care about quality, in the sense you intend?  There are Pakistani families who breed within their own families, producing severely retarded children who go on to continue the practice.  Muslims intend to take over the world and are far outpacing atheists/agnostics in this regard.  

You're writing nonsense. In Islam it is also forbidden to have intercourse and have children with your family members..

In very small, very close related communities, marriages used to be arranged, because older members knew how close men and women were related.. To disallow unwanted mutations (without knowing the truth = science).

The more people are educated, the more they know about quantum physics, chemistry, biology, biotechnology, etc. etc. the less you have such accidental breeding with somebody who has very similar genes as you have (in the "Gattaca" movie, they put it to extremity where sexual partners are testing them self, prior having any sexual relationship).

ps. (after your re-editing of post) you didn't understand my reply.. I was not arguing from religious point of view.. microorganisms, plants and animals have no religion at all..

 

Edited by Sensei
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Argue  with Richard Dawkins, not me.  Dawkins is the one who said all life forms are simply "copy me" replicators.

He didn't add quantum physics, chemistry, biology, biotechnology, etc. etc. to his evolutionary claim.

 

On the subject of intellectualism, on which you put such emphasis, note your own poor grammar:

 

"...they put it to extremity (sic) where sexual partners are testing them self (sic)…"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, StarMan said:

Richard Dawkins explains "the purpose of life is spreading copy me programs."

 

Oops!  Richard Dawkins, Stephen Hawking, Carl Sagan, Sam Harris, Christopher Hitchens, Michael Schermer, Daniel Dennett, and Bill Nye The Science Guy together have fewer children than Osama Bin Laden.

The purpose of "life" not the purpose of any one individual. 

2 hours ago, StarMan said:

Argue  with Richard Dawkins, not me.  Dawkins is the one who said all life forms are simply "copy me" replicators.

He didn't add quantum physics, chemistry, biology, biotechnology, etc. etc. to his evolutionary claim.

 

On the subject of intellectualism, on which you put such emphasis, note your own poor grammar:

 

"...they put it to extremity (sic) where sexual partners are testing them self (sic)…"

You really are a vile individual. I had assumed you were religious, but most religions encourage people to be nice.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.