Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
cornel

Orch Or

Recommended Posts

What do you think about Orch Or theory proposed and very sustained by Stuart Hammerof (top american researcher) and Sir Rorger Penrose (emeritus professor of Oxford ,member of royal family ,physics and math expert). Both are quantum physics experts.

https://www.express.co.uk/news/science/728897/LIFE-AFTER-DEATH-consciousness-continue-SOUL

This link explains it in the simplest way. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, cornel said:

Both are quantum physics experts.

This is (1) irrelevant and (2) not true. 

1 hour ago, cornel said:

member of royal family

Huh!?

Also untrue and, if possible, even less relevant. 

1 hour ago, cornel said:

This link explains it in the simplest way.

That is a trashy tabloid. I wouldn’t rely on it for accurate science reporting. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
40 minutes ago, Strange said:

This is (1) irrelevant and (2) not true. 

Huh!?

Also untrue and, if possible, even less relevant. 

That is a trashy tabloid. I wouldn’t rely on it for accurate science reporting. 

My bad ,royal society.

Then what has this reply to do with the subject?

Edited by cornel

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On domingo, 16 de septiembre de 2018 at 10:17 AM, cornel said:

What do you think about Orch Or theory

Have you ever been in a situation of almost sure death, one that witnesses also describe as an event of sure death and miraculous salvation? People who have suffered this situation say that every moment of life, with all the richness of detail, from things of big size to very small things like skin pores one by one, scenes with all the information up to the microdetails, they are present in the mind. Come, hear, touch, smell everything, everything, everything, they perceive everything up to the microdetail, from every instant of life, from birth or uterus, to the moment of the accident. That is too much information. And that incalculable cluster of information is normally stored in a record that is preserved. That is, in deep human memory, which is not frequently consulted.

A microsecond of life contains information about the person and the environment, with an incalculable degree of detail. It would be amazing a digital memory capable of saving a single scene with that degree of detail. To save the whole life, there is no digital technology that can do it.

The mystery of deep human memory has not been explained until today. Although it stores astonishing amounts of information, the function of memory is monotonous, because it is to store and, upon request, provide the data. The function of consciousness seems much more delicate and more complex than the function of memory. Do you think that an adequate theory of consciousness can be formulated before an adequate theory of human memory?

Once I came across an idea about human memory that, taken seriously and well developed, could lead to an adequate theory. That idea corresponds to the harmonic memory, which is not digital in its essence. If you wanted to use digital systems, you would have to program them to process analog functions. But that story would be misplaced in this thread.

Edited by quiet

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.