Jump to content

Nuclear Reactor water cominination


olivernurse

Recommended Posts

7 hours ago, studiot said:

Welcome Oliver;

What in the water do you think could become radioactive?

Hello, im not sure i was just thinking that exposure to it might result in contanination, thank you. 

7 hours ago, Endy0816 said:

Secondary Coolant(used to make steam) isn't directly in contact with the fuel.

Ah ok, thank you thats helpfull. I was thinking about a concept for somthing and that's good to know 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There are particulates that can flake off of piping and from valves. These can absorb a neutron and become radioactive. Iron isotopes and Cobalt-60 (maybe Nickel, too).

When the reactor is running, O-16 can absorb a neutron and eject a proton, becoming N-16, which is radioactive. This has a half-life of a little over 7 seconds, so this dies away quickly once the reactor is shut down.

20 hours ago, Endy0816 said:

Secondary Coolant(used to make steam) isn't directly in contact with the fuel.

Unless there is a primary to secondary leak. And that assumes a two-loop system.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boiling_water_reactor

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, swansont said:

There are particulates that can flake off of piping and from valves. These can absorb a neutron and become radioactive. Iron isotopes and Cobalt-60 (maybe Nickel, too).

When the reactor is running, O-16 can absorb a neutron and eject a proton, becoming N-16, which is radioactive. This has a half-life of a little over 7 seconds, so this dies away quickly once the reactor is shut down.

Unless there is a primary to secondary leak. And that assumes a two-loop system.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boiling_water_reactor

 

Thank you for updating my knowledge.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

40 minutes ago, swansont said:

There are particulates that can flake off of piping and from valves. These can absorb a neutron and become radioactive. Iron isotopes and Cobalt-60 (maybe Nickel, too).

When the reactor is running, O-16 can absorb a neutron and eject a proton, becoming N-16, which is radioactive. This has a half-life of a little over 7 seconds, so this dies away quickly once the reactor is shut down.

Unless there is a primary to secondary leak. And that assumes a two-loop system.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boiling_water_reactor

Thought about talking about type differences. Under normal conditions for the most common type, though you're good to go.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

49 minutes ago, swansont said:

When the reactor is running, O-16 can absorb a neutron and eject a proton, becoming N-16, which is radioactive. This has a half-life of a little over 7 seconds, so this dies away quickly once the reactor is shut down.

This reaction, to eject free proton, would require fast neutrons. Slow/thermal neutron can be captured by Hydrogen/Deuterium and Oxygen, without further ejection of free proton. If Deuterium will capture neutron, it'll become radioactive Tritium.

"Tritium is also produced in heavy water-moderated reactors whenever a deuterium nucleus captures a neutron. This reaction has a quite small absorption cross section, making heavy water a good neutron moderator, and relatively little tritium is produced. Even so, cleaning tritium from the moderator may be desirable after several years to reduce the risk of its escaping to the environment. Ontario Power Generation's "Tritium Removal Facility" processes up to 2,500 tonnes (2,500 long tons; 2,800 short tons) of heavy water a year, and it separates out about 2.5 kg (5.5 lb) of tritium, making it available for other uses.[6] Deuterium's absorption cross section for thermal neutrons is about 0.52 millibarns, whereas that of oxygen-16 is about 0.19 millibarns and that of oxygen-17 is about 240 millibarns."

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tritium

Half-life of Tritium is 12.32 years .

 

 

Edited by Sensei
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

There are an awful lot of gas turbine generators (both fixed and mobile) in this country. I would think they would find a way to operate them to power the cooling systems. 

or truck in more diesel. or keep the reactor running to power its own auxilaries if nothing else.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.