Jump to content

Space-Time, Imaginary Time and a Singularity.


StuartL

Recommended Posts

Another little question just occurred to me:

How can quantum entangled particles communicate over vast distances instantaneously, when nothing can travel faster than the speed of light?

Easily, if they exist, both in a state of having vast distances between them, and no distance between them, simultaneously.

 

Just a thought.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

54 minutes ago, StuartL said:

Another little question just occurred to me:

How can quantum entangled particles communicate over vast distances instantaneously, when nothing can travel faster than the speed of light?

Easily, if they exist, both in a state of having vast distances between them, and no distance between them, simultaneously.

 

Its more akin to cutting a coin in two. Finding out if your half is heads or tails, tells you the other.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, Mordred said:

 Accurate analogy.

TY, I think of the story about the kid's nickel breaking in two every time.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hollow_Nickel_Case

Easier to relate to.

There's still some QM weirdness I don't quite understand, but at least can grasp the more practical aspects.

Edited by Endy0816
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-fZVQzcqyKU

 

Planck time - “Singularity of time”

All time present all the time.

Flow is an illusion.

Multiverse somehow.

Time is probably not as simple as one Planck time following another (granular)...probably something as yet undiscovered.

 

On ‎2018‎-‎04‎-‎14 at 9:03 AM, Strange said:

This is a science forum. Not a stoned hippy ramblings forum.

On ‎2018‎-‎04‎-‎17 at 3:34 AM, swansont said:

No physics here, as far as I can tell.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, StuartL said:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-fZVQzcqyKU

 

Planck time - “Singularity of time”

All time present all the time.

Flow is an illusion.

Multiverse somehow.

Time is probably not as simple as one Planck time following another (granular)...probably something as yet undiscovered.

Still no physics. Unfortunately for you, this is a science site. If you can't bring science into your conjecture, there's no point in continuing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.