Jump to content

Now the moderators are confused


Recommended Posts

The personae arguing against racial differences were using ad hominem and nonsense.

The person arguing for racial differences was using deep knowledge and logic.

Oh dear whatever are we to do?

Maybe you can cherry pick a mean word I said under the torrent of abuse and pretend it was "just me".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

44 minutes ago, Sammy Boy said:

Maybe you can cherry pick a mean word I said under the torrent of abuse and pretend it was "just me".

!

Moderator Note

You might have noticed that in the modnote I posted in the "human brain" thread I said "You will all cease and desist." So the staff is not pretending it was just you. But thank you for this admission of your unsatisfactory behavior. Instead of worrying about anyone else, worry about yourself.

IOW, you will kindly knock it off.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Some like to provoke others then claim oppression and persecution when others respond.

It's a bit like a child jabbing their finger into their siblings eye then running to tattle to mommy and daddy and whoever else will listen when said sibling responds by punching them in the throat. 

Saying Sammy Boy is acting like a child probably isn't fair, though. Most children I know are far more capable of approaching discussions and their participants with respect. 

Paradoxically, ignorance like Sammy's tends to be learned/taught. 

Edited by iNow
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

I actually had to go to the original thread to get an opinion on this...

The first post you make is:

Quote

So a high IQ population should try to increase the number of genetic morons to increase diversity? Where did "science" make this argument? Are you sure it's not an ethnic political interest based piece of nonsense?

 Of course, no one even bothered to reply to your assertions. Then you go on to use pretentious terms to say nothing.

Quote

No, ceteris paribus, all other things being equal.

Quote

How silly. Do you define "science" as "concepts which match my fashionable PC beliefs de jour"?

This kind of talk reminds me of talk-shows from TLC or other channels for oxygen thieves. No one was targeting you.

This is not a political sheeple rally. People will actually look into your claims before believing them. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.