# Einstein inertial mass

## Recommended Posts

Einstein's (1917) energy equation E = mc^2 is used to justify the structural unification of an electron with a massless electromagnetic field but Einstein's inertial mass (m = E/c^2) is massless since E represents the energy of an em photon (Einstein, sec 15). Does this not prove that quantum electrodynamics, string theory, quantum field theory, quantum chromodynamics, plasma physics, condense matter physics, and particle physics that use the gauge transformation of Maxwell's equations is just plain incompetence in motion.

Edited by ivylove
##### Share on other sites

"Inertial mass is massless'
That makes no sense.

##### Share on other sites

"Hence we can say: If a body takes up an amount of energy Eo, then its inertial mass increases by an amount

Eo/c2

(Einstein6, § 15). You were saying???. Maybe boys should consider what you are saying first before you post. Just a little suggestion.

Edited by ivylove
##### Share on other sites

If you have rest-mass of electron me = 9.11*10^-31 kg,

after multiplying it by c^2, where c=299792458 m/s,

It is energy after annihilation.

But you need also positron, antimatter antiparticle of electron, with the same rest-mass as electron me.

$e^- + e^+ \rightarrow \gamma + \gamma$

Prior annihilation you have energy (sum of rest-masses of electron and positron, multiplied by c^2, to convert units):

$E=2 m_e c^2$

After annihilation you have energy (sum of gamma photons energies):

$E=2 h f_c$

Giving you final equation

$2 m_e c^2 = 2 h f_c$

Edited by Sensei
##### Share on other sites

Einstein is attempting to justify Fresnel's ether composed of matter with an electromagnetic ether using the inertial mass since Einstein is justifying the existence of Fresnel's ether using the reversal of the negative result of Michelson-Morley experiment based on Lorentz's theory.

"On the other hand, all coordinate systems moving relatively were to be regarded as in motion with respect to the æther. To this motion against the æther ("æther-drift") were attributed more complicated laws which were supposed to hold relative to. Strictly speaking, such an æther-drift ought also to be assumed relative to the earth, and for a long time the efforts of physicists were devoted to attempts to detect the existence of an æther-drift at the earth's surface....Although the estimated difference between these two times is exceedingly small, Michelson and Morley performed an experiment involving interference in which this difference should have been clearly detectable. But the experiment gave a negative result — a fact very perplexing to physicists. Lorentz and FitzGerald rescued the theory from this difficulty by assuming that the motion of the body relative to the æther produces a contraction of the body in the direction of motion, the amount of contraction being just sufficient to compensate for the difference in time mentioned above." (Einstein6, § 16).

Einstein is using the reversal of Michelson-Morley experiment to justify the existence of Fresnel's ether (Michelson-Morley, p. 333) based on Lorentz's theory but Lorentz uses the constant magnitude of the earth's tangential velocity vector px  yet at the surface of the earth, the magnitude of the earth's tangential velocity vector p, formed by the earth's daily and yearly motions, is not constant.At 6:00 pm, the magnitude of the earth's tangential velocity px is 462 m/s (fig 11) and  at 7:00 pm, the magnitude of pincreases to 5,077 m/s. At midnight, the earth's tangential velocity vector px  is 30,462 m/s. As time increases, the earth's tangential velocity px increases from 462 m/s to 30,462 m/s (6:00 pm - 12:00 am) which proves Einstein's special relativity is physically invalid.

Girls Rock harder than boys.

Edited by ivylove
##### Share on other sites

If you have rest-mass of electron me = 9.11*10^-31 kg,

after multiplying it by c^2, where c=299792458 m/s,

It is energy after annihilation.

But you need also positron, antimatter antiparticle of electron, with the same rest-mass as electron me.

_____________________________________________________________________________________________________

The inertial mass is massless. An electron has a mass.

e  +e + γ+γ

##### Share on other sites

Massless means having no rest-mass. Massless particles have kinetic energy, momentum, and relativistic-mass.

##### Share on other sites

I am persuaded that Einstein's inertial mass was 90kg

##### Share on other sites

Really ? He always seemed so frail.
I would have thought 70 kg.

##### Share on other sites

Massless means electromagnetic photon---inertial mass.

"Hence we can say: If a body takes up an amount of energy Eo, then its inertial mass increases by an amount Eo/c2 " (Einstein6, § 15).

Thanks for dinner.

Edited by ivylove
##### Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, MigL said:

Really ? He always seemed so frail.
I would have thought 70 kg.

So did I until I checked with Googiebaby

##### Share on other sites

Real men would concede that why girls are superior.

"Hence we can say: If a body takes up an amount of energy Eo, then its inertial mass increases by an amount Eo/c2 " (Einstein6, § 15).

"The special theory of relativity has rendered the Maxwell-Lorentz theory so plausible"

"we see that the term mc2, which has hitherto attracted our attention, is nothing else than the energy possessed by the body before it absorbed the energy Eo

Edited by ivylove
##### Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, ivylove said:

Real men would concede that why girls are superior.

"Hence we can say: If a body takes up an amount of energy Eo, then its inertial mass increases by an amount Eo/c2 " (Einstein6, § 15).

"The special theory of relativity has rendered the Maxwell-Lorentz theory so plausible"

"we see that the term mc2, which has hitherto attracted our attention, is nothing else than the energy possessed by the body before it absorbed the energy Eo

.

But I am not a real man, I am just a plastic facsimile

Are you a robot?

##### Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, ivylove said:

Are you a robot?

No I am legion

##### Share on other sites

!

Moderator Note

thread locked.  You are cutting and pasting from a sci.physics.relativity paper (that looks a little cracked to begin with.  Stop this practice now or you will be sanctioned.

##### Share on other sites

This topic is now closed to further replies.
×