Michael F. D. Posted June 10, 2003 Share Posted June 10, 2003 The known laws of conservation, such as the law of conservation of pulse, the law of conservation of mass, the law of conservation of energy etc. there are a quotients by events of one general law. This is the LAW of CONSERVATION of TIME CYCLE: The TIME is INHERENT for ANY OBJECT, i.e. its TIME CYCLE, is SAVING CONSTANCY. Any ACTION, which is DIRECTED on CHANGE of the TIME CYCLE, does LEAD to a CORRESPONDING COMPENSATION RELUCTANCE. This the Law can be used in respect of any object from the atom before universe, including alive world in all its manifestations. It explains an all, well studied and studied in part, phenomenas and can predicts the behaviour of object in any situations. Any of known and an unknown yet forces and phenomenas has manifests itself as compensation in the main process of the conservation of Time Cycle of any object. In effect of its versatility it is possible to consider this law as a THEORY of EVERYTHING. It does not disagree the existing scientific presentations and is confirmed by an all accumulated experience of mankind. © 2003. Michael F. Dmitriyev. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fafalone Posted June 10, 2003 Share Posted June 10, 2003 Are you friends with Zarkov? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NavajoEverclear Posted June 11, 2003 Share Posted June 11, 2003 I agree with fafalone. My idea of time is very simple--- the universe is made of stuff--- stuff moves--- it takes time to do this. Anything wrong with that idea? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Michael F. D. Posted June 11, 2003 Author Share Posted June 11, 2003 Originally posted by fafalone Are you friends with Zarkov? I do not know Zarkov. I hear this name in the first time. I send on forum my own ideas only. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Michael F. D. Posted June 11, 2003 Author Share Posted June 11, 2003 Originally posted by NavajoEverclear I agree with fafalone. My idea of time is very simple--- the universe is made of stuff--- stuff moves--- it takes time to do this. Anything wrong with that idea? Your simple idea does not give the answer nor on one of the questions about device of universe and its parts. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Radical Edward Posted June 11, 2003 Share Posted June 11, 2003 it explains nothing and there is no reason to suggest it. It doesn't follow consistently with any theory I have seen and has no merits. I can't even think of anyway to get off topic and turn it into a proper science thread, so I am moving this to pseudoscience. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JaKiri Posted June 11, 2003 Share Posted June 11, 2003 Having understood absolutely none of that post, I must resort to the tried and tested Whut? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sayonara Posted June 11, 2003 Share Posted June 11, 2003 Hallelujah! It's ages since we had a proper PS thread. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Radical Edward Posted June 11, 2003 Share Posted June 11, 2003 Originally posted by Sayonara³ Hallelujah! It's ages since we had a proper PS thread. it is even copyrighted. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now